Search for: "Herring v. Commissioner" Results 421 - 440 of 3,490
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
During the Federal Trade Commission’s April 28 open meeting, Commissioners utilized the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in AMG Capital Management, LLC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Newfoundland and Labrador (Minister of Government Services and Lands) et al. 2015 NLTD(G.) 14Administrative Law – Civil Rights Summary: Dichmont, for reasons of her religious convictions, resigned as a marriage commissioner when the Government of Newfoundland and Labrador insisted that same sex marriages had to be performed. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:21 am by David Canton
” In State Farm v Privacy Commissioner, the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. questioned the privacy commissioner’s jurisdiction to investigate a refusal to provide access to personal information and her power to compel the production of documents during the course of an investigation. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
18 May 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Citing Matter of Francello v Mendoza, 165 AD3d 1555 and Matter of State of New York v New York State Pub. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
The second case is a child protective proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10 wherein the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of fact-finding and disposition of the Family Court, Kings County dated 5 January 2011, as, after fact-finding and dispositional hearings, found that she had neglected the subject child, and placed the child in the custody of the New York City Commissioner of Social Services. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 2:10 pm
  On her own motion, the commissioner dismisses the charges pursuant to Section 1385 of the Penal Code, which provides: "The judge or magistrate may, either of his or her motion or upon application of the prosecuting attorney, and in the interests of justice, order an action to be dismissed. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 10:12 am by Rosalind English
Together with this, the test laid down by Laws LJ in  R(Wood) v Commissioner of the Metropolis  provides a firm guiding hand to this notoriously difficult balancing act: First, the alleged threat or assault to the individual’s personal autonomy must (if article 8 is to be engaged) attain ‘a certain level of seriousness’. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
For example, a woman claimed a pharmacy allowed her husband to watch CCTV footage of her buying a pregnancy test kit. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 7:18 am
R (On The Application of Animal Defenders International) V Secretary of State For Culture, Media and Sport (Respondent) [2008] UKHL 15 (12 March 2008) Norris (Appellant) v Judgments - Government of the United States of America and others (Respondent) (Criminal Appeal from Her Majesty's High Court of Justice) [2008] UKHL 16 (12 March 2008) Brit Syndicates Limited for and on behalf of Brit Syndicate 2987 at Lloyd’s for the 2003 year of account and others… [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
On the other hand, counseling letters may not be used as a subterfuge for avoiding initiating formal disciplinary action against a tenured individual.The decisions of the Commissioner of Education in Fusco v Jefferson County School District, CEd, 14,396, and Irving v Troy City School District, CEd 14,373, are instructive in this regard. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 2:08 am
Free speech does not protect employee making a racist statementPereira v Commissioner of Social Services (SJC-08218), the Supreme Judicial Court, Mass., 432 Mass. 251The First Amendment’s guarantee of free speech did not shield a twelve-year public employee from dismissal for telling a racist joke at a political gathering.Linda M. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 3:32 am
If the member is not "in service" on that date, he or she forfeits his or her retirement benefits.The Court of Appeals addressed the provisions of Section 13-173.1 in Waldeck v NYC Employees' Retirement System, 81 N.Y.2d 804, decided with Barbaro v NYC Employees' Retirement System. [read post]