Search for: "Honeywell"
Results 421 - 440
of 788
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Nov 2011, 4:11 am
In return for its financial contributions to ILR, Honeywell has received policy and public relations help when its negligence has been uncovered. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:58 am
Div. 1983) (quoting Honeywell v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:28 am
., the manufacturer of the Zylon fiber, and Honeywell Inc., Second Chance Body Armor Inc. and First Choice Armor Inc., which were involved in the production or sale of Zylon body armor. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 3:07 am
For instance, in return for being an ILR board member, Honeywell International has received lobbying and public relations help when its negligence has been uncovered. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 1:53 am
For instance, in return for being an ILR board member, Honeywell International has received lobbying and public relations help when its negligence has been uncovered. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:34 pm
The complaint makes three claims of patent infringement and seeks an injunction, damages and attorney fees.Practice Tip: According to Reuters.com, patent lawyers for Borg Warner filed a similar patent infringement lawsuit against Honeywell, which resulted in a $32.5 million settlement in favor of Borg Warner. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:00 am
”One ILR board member highlighted in the report is Honeywell International, which has regularly taken competitors to court, but would prefer not to be held accountable for distributing defective body armor to law enforcement personnel across the country, or downplaying the dangers of asbestos exposure.In return for its financial contributions to ILR, Honeywell has received policy and public relations help when its negligence has been uncovered. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:36 am
The Whispertrack system distributes noise abatement procedures in much the same way as Instrument Flight Rule procedures are distributed today: through flight planning/dispatch services developed by companies such as Honeywell, Universal, flightplan.com, AIRNAV and others. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:00 am
Here is the 2010 total compensation for the executives of some of the companies identified in the report: Honeywell International: $14.8 million Abbott Laboratories: $20 million Johnson and Johnson: $21 million Prudential: $16 million But these guys are worth it because of all the jobs that they are creating, right? [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
The irony does not stop with Honeywell as the report also highlights the litigation hypocrisy of several other ILR board members. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:40 am
For example, one ILR board member, Honeywell International, systematically takes competitors to court when they feel that they have been wronged. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
For example, Honeywell International is one of the most prolific corporate plaintiffs—taking many groups to court for a variety of causes each year. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
For example, the report explains how one board member, Honeywell International, takes its own competitors to court, year after year, to protect what it considers its own legal interests. [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
For example, one corporation highlighted in the report, Honeywell International, regularly files suit against competitors in court for what it deems their misconduct. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:11 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified Honeywell International Inc. of Morristown, New Jersey and its subsidiary Skyforce Avionics Ltd. of the United Kingdom as the respondents in this investigation. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:06 am
Honeywell allegedly knew, but forgot to disclose, that the material seriously degrades in heat and humidity. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
And someone is wasting no time in seeking reexamination of Honeywell’s U.S. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 2:00 am
And someone is wasting no time in seeking reexamination of Honeywell’s U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 12:22 pm
Honeywell Specialty Materials LLC , C.A. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 12:36 pm
Cir. 2007) (“When a patent thus describes the features of the ‘present invention’ as a whole, this description limits the scope of the invention”); Honeywell Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
