Search for: "IN RE THE ADOPTION OF C W D" Results 421 - 440 of 527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm by Bexis
  For example if ninety-nine out of one hundred medical experts agreed that there were four equally possible causes of a certain injury, A, B, C and D, and plaintiff produces the one expert who conclusively states that A was the certain cause of his injury, defendant would be precluded from presenting the testimony of any of the other ninety-nine experts, unless they would testify conclusively that B, C, or D was the cause of injury. . . . [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm
§ 41.37(c)(1)(vii) ("Rule 41.37"). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 6:25 am by Victoria VanBuren
See In re Daley, 29 S.W.3d 915, 918 (Tex. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
  Thus “[w]e do not believe comment k was intended to provide nor should it provide all ethical drugs with blanket immunity from strict liability design defect claims. [read post]