Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: J. F., A CHILD" Results 421 - 440 of 713
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Sep 2014, 3:16 pm by Malik W. Ahmad
(f) Except as otherwise provided in paragraph (p), one vehicle if the judgment debtor’s equity does not exceed $15,000 or the creditor is paid an amount equal to any excess above that equity. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 12:12 am by Steve Baird
: Protecting Small Businesses from Overly Litigious Corporations and Trademark Infringement Suits, 19 J. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 11:14 am
The free speech rights here were — as in many free speech cases — the rights of pretty rude speakers, certainly ones whose message and manners I do not endorse. [read post]
24 Aug 2014, 10:55 pm
Jeronimo-Bautista, 425 F. 3d 1266 (10th Cir. 2005) (concluding that Congress can prohibit the purely intrastate production of child pornography because the aggregated effect of such production would impact interstate commerce). [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 9:52 pm by JP Sarmiento
Although J-2 dependents cannot independently apply for a waiver, in cases where a J-2 child reaches 21, the Waiver Review Division may consider requests for waivers on behalf of the J-2 dependent. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 12:33 pm by Elim
& Roach, Kent 2009 Link The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Third Edition Sharpe, Robert J. 2005 Link Child Support Guidelines in Canada, 2012 Payne, Julien D. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 2:24 pm by Lucy Reed
But I’ve rarely encountered a case where a child or young person wants their f*cked up family stuff to be in the papers or online for all their mates to see. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 8:05 pm
Sayer, 748 F.3d 425 (1st Cir. 2014), or anything else), should thus be constitutional. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 7:20 am by Jeff Welty
United States, __ F.3d __, 2014 WL 2699722 (4th Cir. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 4:28 am by Lisa A. Mazzie
Judge Crabb cited Justice Oliver Wendall Holmes when she wrote, “[I]f blind adherence to the past is the only justification for the law, it must fail. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 5:57 am by Joel R. Brandes
The father also received significant tax deductions and credits for the children, whereas the mother received none (Domestic Relations Law  240[1-b][f][4]  ). [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:08 pm by Jon Sands
Sullivan, Nos. 12-10196, 12-10217 (Ikuta, J, with Tallman, J, and O'Connell, DJ (CD Cal)) --- The court affirmed the defendant's convictions (on his appeal) and vacated his sentences (on the government's cross-appeal) for producing and possessing child pornography. [read post]
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
However, if any outright distribution to a child of decedent's could be exempt from the generation skipping transfer tax said child's share was to be held in a separate trust for such child. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 3:30 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
" Specifically, Love tweeted: “I was f—— devestated when Rhonda J. [read post]