Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: R. S. T., A CHILD (MOTHER)" Results 421 - 440 of 1,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2020, 8:42 am by Eugene Volokh
This error influenced the applicable burden of proof and permeated the court's assessment of the child's best interests. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 5:50 pm
STLToday.com has posted an interesting article about a Maryland hospital's ban on photographing or videotaping of births. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Co-parents may face the same problem with de facto parentage and parenting agreement claims—a biological mother can just move to a state that doesn’t recognize such claims and thereby avoid sharing the child. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 9:45 am
" [Uh oh, she's just like us but with unimaginable bad luck -- and she's a sympathetic mother figure, sacrificing everything for her child, to boot.] [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
If the pregnancy terminates in a live birth, the father and mother generally have presumptively equal parental rights in the child. [read post]
2 Dec 2012, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The mothers need the help, and the pedophile knows how to manipulate the situation to get the child alone with him. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 7:59 am by Robert A. Epstein
   An interesting article from today's Chicago Tribune by Manya A. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  Given that only one day per week was implicated, why wasn’t the radius clause larger given the mothers clear financial distress? [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Eric S. Solotoff
  Given that only one day per week was implicated, why wasn’t the radius clause larger given the mothers clear financial distress? [read post]
1 Jan 2017, 10:30 am by MBettman
 The court held that under its existing precedent, the test in a name change case is the best interest of the child, which in this case was to keep the mothers name. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:26 pm by Larisa Vaysman
” The Court also rejected the state of Kentucky’s argument that the plaintiff was not entitled to payments because she was the childrens’ mothers aunt, holding that “[t]o the extent . . . failure to make maintenance payments turns on the distinction between relative and non-relative foster care providers, it plainly violates federal law. [read post]
6 May 2007, 2:03 pm
"I think the problem with those laws is that, No. 1, they need to consider a child's best interest. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 9:03 am by Hull and Hull LLP
Sharon Davis: Yes, it’s a topic I’m very interested in. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 9:47 am by Eugene Volokh
It’s (1) an interesting decision in its own right, (2) an interesting twist on the “cultural exception” debate in criminal law — though note that the statute isn’t expressly focused on cultural minorities — and (3) a test case that might help us think about whether such de minimis statutes are a good idea. [read post]