Search for: "In Re: Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases"
Results 421 - 440
of 550
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jul 2010, 6:35 am
You instruct your general counsel to obtain a standard joint defense agreement and to have it signed by the lawyers who will become involved in this case. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm
When the Supreme Court decided Roger Coleman's case (Coleman v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 9:35 am
Ct. 447, 454 (2009) (discussing the particular respect juries afford to American veterans). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 3:04 pm
In the Court's news release detailing the appointment, Garringer's credentials are detailed - they include serving as a Monroe County judge (1977 - 1980) and for the past 7 years, serving as staff attorney to the Supreme Court Criminal Court Steering Committee and the Supreme Court Committee on Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
We are practically alone in tolerating this practice – only Louisiana also allows non-unanimous juries in felony cases. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
Simple assault is a disorderly persons offense unless committed in a fight or scuffle entered into by mutual consent, in which case it is a petty disorderly persons offense. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 9:14 pm
In re: Jeffrey Beard, et.al. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 2:45 am
In a criminal case, the proof of guilt must be stronger than that. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:53 pm
So you're sitting in prison. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm
In any case where the legal evidence raises an issue hereunder, the jury shall be instructed that if it believes, or has a reasonable doubt, that the evidence was obtained in violation of the provisions of this Article, then and in such event, the jury shall disregard any such evidence so obtained.The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals instructs that "the trial court has a duty to give an article 38.23 instruction sua sponte (on its… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 2:03 pm
Yesterday the Court issued opinions in two criminal cases, summarized below. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 3:39 am
You’re defending a case in which the victims point to your guy as the shooter, you announce in opening statement that you’re going to show your client acted in self-defense, and then are nonplussed to find that all of the victims have suffered a memory lapse and can’t identify who shot them. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
” The only other criminal case decided by the Court was US v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm
Marcus, No. 08-1341 (5/24/2010) The circuit court impermissibly water downed the “plain error ” standard. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:14 pm
In re Bruce Webster, 2010 U.S. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
If four votes can be mustered one way or the other in any of the cases heard with the seat vacant, they’ll be decided; if the remaining six justices tie, Brown will review the case and cast the deciding vote, although he can also order re-argument. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 8:28 am
United States Docket: 09-583 Issue: Whether, in a discrimination case tried by a jury, the trial judge should, if requested to do so, instruct the jury that it may infer the existence of a discriminatory motive from the falsity of a defendant’s explanation of its action. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 11:49 am
The district court did not err in instructing the jury as to the standard for willfulness. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
They’re initiating a criminal prosecution. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:22 am
In the opinion, 1st Circuit Judge Michael Boudin noted that the district court's instructions and the jury verdict were in line with 1st Circuit precedent, which interprets the term "cocaine base" in the statute to include "all forms of cocaine base, including but not limited to crack cocaine. [read post]
