Search for: "In Re Asbestos Cases" Results 421 - 440 of 857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
There was a defamation case that will get media attention. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
” Recommendation at 3, citing In re New York Renu with Moistureloc Prod. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Supp. 1151, 1160 (E.D.La. 1997) (noting, in penile implant case, that “any” increased risk suggests that the exposure “may” have played some causal role) In re Breast Implant Litigation, 11 F. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 11:22 am by Schachtman
  See, e.g., In re Fibreboard Corp.,893 F.2d 706, 712 (5th Cir.1990) (“It is evident that these statistical estimates deal only with general causation, for population-based probability estimates do not speak to a probability of causation in any one case; the estimate of relative risk is a property of the studied population, not of an individual’s case. [read post]
2 May 2013, 9:23 am by Schachtman
  They have discovered and built a perpetual motion machine — the asbestos litigation. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
  If an MDL decision was favorable to the defendant only on, say, asbestos exposure product identification (the most common example by far), we have not included it.Caveat #4. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *45-46.But we don’t want just to discuss yucky cases, so we’re bookending Block with another pain pump decision, Prather v. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
Johns–Manville Corp., 539 A.2d 871 (1988), where the defendants were asbestos manufacturers headquartered in Pennsylvania and the plaintiff was a New Jersey resident injured, mostly, in New Jersey (but also a little in Pennsylvania). [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 6:40 am
In most cases, asbestos plaintiffs file suit directly against the company itself. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 5:34 am by Bexis
  Id. at *5.Now on to why we’re posting about Lamere. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 11:00 am by Legal Beagle
Macreath was represented at the Court of Session by Edinburgh law firm Simpson & Marwick, one of whose partners told MSPs at the Scottish Parliament HERE that ‘asbestos is good for you’. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 4:12 am by Jon Gelman
  During inspections conducted in 2011, EPA inspectors discovered numerous violations, from failing to inspect facilities for asbestos containing materials, failing to re-inspect campuses with known asbestos containing materials, and failing to have an Asbestos Management Plan. [read post]
20 Feb 2013, 6:07 am
If a claimant files a claim with an asbestos trust after a judgment has already been found in another case, the court would actually be allowed to re-open the original case and reduce the damages awarded. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 11:46 am by Schachtman
Tenn. 1990) (statistical evidence of risk of lung cancer from asbestos and smoking was insufficient to show individual causation, without evidence of asbestos fibers in the plaintiff’s lung tissue) Smith v. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 12:53 pm by Bexis
  She claimed that Pennsylvania would recognize a heeding presumption, relying on asbestos cases. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 9:44 am by Bexis
 This will reduce the settlement value of cases and increase the likelihood of winning the cases that defendants try.FactsFennell was an asbestos case. [read post]