Search for: "In Re Goldstein"
Results 421 - 440
of 845
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
Cliett, 12-773, the Ninth Circuit state-on-top habeas case we’re still getting to know. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 8:03 am
See In re Huang, 100 F.3d 135, 139-40 (Fed. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
We’re eager to know. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Goldstein v. [read post]
15 Mar 2013, 10:54 am
What we’re already seeing: software built into all kinds of devices. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 11:43 am
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
19 Jan 2013, 2:21 pm
(The articles reference 2007 as a starting date for the complaint, although they’re not entirely clear on this point.) [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
Linda Greenhouse is a Senior Research Scholar in Law, the Knight Distinguished Journalist in Residence and Joseph Goldstein Lecturer in Law at Yale Law School. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 1:13 pm
(Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the petitioner in Pleau.) [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:03 pm
§ 2254(d), that a defendant retains a constitutional right to revoke his prior waiver of counsel at trial and require re-appointment of counsel to file a new-trial motion. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 9:32 am
Lamberth, In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 846 F.Supp.2d 1 (D.D.C. 2012) - Ojetta R. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:42 pm
We're not just dearth, we're trivia.Yesterday, it was announced that the Ohio Supremes issued amendments to the Rules governing the practice of law in Ohio. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 5:48 am
According to Goldstein, up until now, many colleges and universities have re-digitized the same books over and over, on demand, for each blind or print-disabled student that needs them. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Either way it’s infringement and they’re an infringer, subject to the full range of remedies under the Act. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
[Editor's note: Tomorrow, Josh Goldstein is presenting on this topic as part of the CITP Luncheon Series, at the Woodrow Wilson School on Princeton's campus. (12:10pm, in Robertson Hall room 023)] Around the world, societies generally agree that governments and bureaucrats should use the coercive power of the state, not to create extractive institutions that appropriate resources to the powerful elite, but rather to create inclusive institutions, which re-distribute… [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 2:27 pm
The biggest one making headlines is “collusion,” which we’re told affected fewer than 5% of real estate transactions before 2009, but doubled by 2010, and then fell only a little, to 6.8%, in 2011. [read post]
18 Sep 2012, 10:29 pm
By Brian Taylor Goldstein I wonder if you would mind giving me some advice on a visa situation with one of my artists. [read post]
