Search for: "In re Marks"
Results 421 - 440
of 29,925
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2014, 2:52 am
In re Phoenix Intangibles Holding Company, Serial No. 85355964 (August 26, 2014) [not precedential]. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm
It will be interesting to watch how the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board resolves this dispute which in some ways requires the Board to weigh in on some of the same questions that arose in the In re Slants case. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 5:30 am
This is indeed parody — or, if you’re feeling adventurous, an art piece. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:23 am
The reasons why I think the tenants are not liable for this cost are: The tenants were not provided with anywhere else to dry their clothes – for example the landlord could easily have provided a tumble dryer or a washer dryer The tenants were following the landlord’s guidance The property had not been newly re-decorated when they moved in As Frances points out – the flat was probably due for re-decoration anyway – it has not been re-decorated for… [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 10:01 am
See In re Spirits International N.V., 86 USPQ2d 1078 (TTAB 2008). [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
” 419 F.2d at 927 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
In re Certa ProPainters, Ltd., Serial No. 77046679 (November 14, 2008) [not precedential].Section 2(b) bars the registration of a mark that "consists of or comprises the flag or coat of arms or other insignia of ... any foreign nation, or any simulation thereof. [read post]
Marking the 40th Anniversary of In re Quinlan’s Landmark Contribution to Death & Dying Jurisprudence
28 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
Norm Cantor reflects, this week, on the 40th Anniversary of In re Quinlan’s landmark contribution to death and dying jurisprudence. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 8:08 am
Earlier national registrations are only one factor which may be taken into account when assessing the eligibility of a sign to be registered as a Community trade mark, the GC said, and OHIM is under no obligation to follow the assessment of the competent national authorities or to register the mark at issue as a Community trade mark on the basis of those considerations. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Attorney Mark P. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 5:59 am
In re J. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 3:16 pm
We get a lot of calls from entertainers/bands and technically they're offering entertainment services (live musical performances to be exact). [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:55 pm
See In re Tigerland-Foxland of NY, Inc. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:15 am
., an applicant for a color mark has been required to prove that the color actually serves as an indicator of source in the minds of consumers by showing that the mark has acquired... [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:15 am
Previously, before June 22, 2012, a trade mark was deemed to be protected in respect of the... [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:15 am
In re Brunetti, Appeal No. 2015-1109 (Fed. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Prior to that, however, a major issue in false marking litigation was whether plaintiffs could replead to satisfy the requirements of In re BP Lubricants, which set forth pleading standards for such cases. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
FOR FREEIf you’re looking for some “HELP,” you’ve come to the right place.You can now watch Blake Ridder’s first feature film – starring Emily Redpath, Sarah Alexandra Marks, and Louis James -- for FREE, on TUBI: https://tubitv.com/movies/678117/ (Tubi TV is available in Canada, the US, Mexico, and Australia. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 2:59 pm
We’re all the same — everybody bleeds red,” she said. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 5:52 am
See, e.g., In re Brown Jordan Co., 219 USPQ 375 (TTAB 1983) (holding that stamping the mark after purchase of the goods, on a tag attached to the goods that are later transported in commerce, is sufficient use). [read post]
