Search for: "In re Michael G." Results 421 - 440 of 953
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Oct 2014, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Holder, (Columbia Law Review, Forthcoming).Steven G. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 3:37 am by SHG
See, e. g., Pickering, supra, at 568; Connick, supra, at 147; Rankin v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm by Schachtman
Since 1663, the Royal Society has sported the motto:  “Nullius in verba,” on no one’s authority. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 5:48 pm by Wells Bennett
As we noted earlier today, documents bearing on the In Re Directives litigation have now been declassified. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:29 pm by Michael Kraut
We’re located at 6255 Sunset Boulevard, Suite 1480, Los Angeles, California 90028. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:27 am
My students Nate Barrett, Charles Linehan, and Michael Smith worked on it, and New Jersey lawyer Daniel Schmutter of Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP was kind enough to agree to be pro bono local counsel — many thanks to him for that! [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Michael, the victim surcharge did not constitute cruel or unusual punishment in his particular circumstances. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 1:04 am
By July 2011, the Court had not yet ruled, and the case was re-assigned to another judge. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 1:15 pm by Mark Walsh
At 10 a.m., the Justices take the bench, and Chief Justice John G. [read post]