Search for: "In re Robert B." Results 421 - 440 of 2,113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2009, 10:00 pm
So we're skimming the tables of contents for you. [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 6:32 pm
b) Once again, Justice Kennedy's point about Tumey is instructive. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:03 am by Jon Hyman
I'm well aware that I write a lot about my daughter’s music, but I do so because (a) I know a lot you enjoy it, and (b) I’m a really proud dad. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:13 am
 at 6-7 (block quote from Rule 26(b)(1) omitted). [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The most striking example of apparently mistaken incontestability comes from B&B v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 12:38 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Endorsement signals some desired connection b/t endorser and endorsed. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction: Robert Burrell IP Australia exerts extraordinary control over legislative agenda; if you can persuade IP Au. that something needs to change, then it can change quite quickly. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 4:15 pm by Ronald Mann
Oklahoma was that Chief Justice John Roberts didn’t manage to be in the majority in every single 5-4 decision this term. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:27 am
 Site-specific cat.Sculpture by Wang Du, exhibited by the Museum of Cat in 2017Moreover, as described in the chapter by Donn Zaretsky,** we encounter the dispute between installation artist Christoph Büchel and the Massachusetts Museum of Contemporary Art as evidence of VARA’s [relative] success at granting relief to artists when “a museum behaves badly” (citing New York Times art critic Robert Smith’s, p. 50, ‘Training Ground for Moral… [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:17 am by Simon Chester
Translated as <> Georges AUDET, Robert BONHOMME, Clément GASCON, et Magali COUR­NOYER-PROULX, Le congédiement en droit québécois en matière de contrat individuel de travail, 3e éd., Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Possibly Yes (But We’re Not Sure Why). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
” Instead of amending their answer or proceeding with the briefing schedule for summary judgment, defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), raising the new affirmative defense of res judicata, also known as claim preclusion. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 11:05 am by Rebecca Tushnet
We also sometimes act irrationally b/c our reasoning is messed up. [read post]