Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham" Results 421 - 440 of 2,092
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Oct 2009, 10:54 am
  "This should send a message to the parole board that their arrogance not to change their policy won't work any longer, that constitutional rights matter in how they do their business," said William Habern, a noted parole-law attorney from Riverside who represents Graham. [read post]
23 Sep 2006, 9:14 am
"But of course the administration has said exactly the opposite, and so for that matter have sources close to McCain, Warner, and Graham (see the Byron York article in the previous posts). [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:02 am by Dennis Crouch
Against this background, the obviousness or nonobviousness of the subject matter is determined. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Tun-Jen Chiang
This is an incredibly unhelpful way to understand the Morse case (not least because the Supreme Court later upheld Alexander Graham Bell’s claim to using electricity to communicate voice). [read post]
4 May 2009, 3:16 pm
Lyle Denniston has some great analysis on the matter here. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 7:56 am by Ryan Corbett
Lindsey Graham, a Republican Senator from South Carolina, lauded the President’s statement, and indicated that he intended to introduce legislation to the same effect. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 9:54 am by dbllawyers
Currently only Indiana and Florida expressly prohibit the enforcement of no-contest clauses and Vermont is the only state that does not address the matter either in statute or case law. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:20 pm by The Murray Law Firm
According to The Macon Telegraph, gunfire erupted at the “Rain Tree Apartments” on Graham Road, shortly after 11:30 p.m. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 3:00 am
 Maybe the public, deep down and despite all the lawyer jokes, feels the same way.Thanks for reading, Sean Graham [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 7:35 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 2:55 am
  Once the PTO has established the Graham factual findings and concluded that the claimed invention would have been obvious, the burden then shifts to the applicant. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:23 am by Robin Shea
Freedom of speech about matters of public concern isn’t a “public policy” in Michigan? [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 1:20 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
  I take the view that rather than silencing particular points of view - no matter how upsetting or ill informed - it is better to allow the comment to stand and have others respond. [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 9:44 am
Graham as VP and CFO. [read post]