Search for: "In the Matter of Zimmerman" Results 421 - 440 of 469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2015, 12:57 pm by Eric Goldman
State Farm Mutual * Court Orders Plaintiff to Turn Over Facebook and MySpace Passwords in Discovery Dispute — Zimmerman v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 7:55 am
  The combined expansions of criminal coverage and the heightened severity of punishments are matters of grave concern that call for a serious rethinking of this project. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 9:38 am by Eric Goldman
These kinds of opinions, though an appropriate format for resolving litigation, unfortunately obscure the real matters at issue. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 6:58 am
" California Executions When the Supreme Court takes up the matter, it will be the first time in more than a century that it has ruled on an execution method. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 10:35 am by Emily Coward
., dissenting) (“… voir dire on the subject of race is constitutionally required in some cases, mandated as a matter of federal supervisory authority in others, and typically advisable in any case if a defendant requests it. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 1:36 pm by Bexis
 As a matter of law, the manufacturers of [a drug] have no duty to communicate any information regarding the risks of taking this product to anyone other than their own customers.2010 WL 5485812, at *5 (quoting Walls v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:45 am by Eric
The reason Medical Justice's change of heart matters is that shady or clueless vendors keep developing new ways to suppress unwanted consumer reviews, and I hope Medical Justice's experiences will discourage other vendors from trying the copyright hack. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
At its September 30, 2013 Conference, the Court will consider petitions seeking review of issues such as the termination of parental rights under the Indian Child Welfare Act, the constitutionality of Virginia’s “crimes against nature” statute, protections on free speech interests of government employees, and a free exercise challenge to workers’ compensation requirements. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Ashby Donald and others v France (Judgment of 10 January 2013) the Court of Human Rights has, for the first time in a judgment on the merits, clarified that a conviction based on copyright law for illegally reproducing or publicly communicating copyright protected material can be regarded as an interference with the right of freedom of expression and information under Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Session 4 | Traci Zimmerman (James Madison University), Moderator Confederate Copyright: The Role of Nationalism in Designing a Copyright RegimeShane Valenzi (Carmen D. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:42 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm by Eric Goldman
Plus, it mattered that the successor licensee never fully understood the scope of the exclusive license despite many, many (over?) [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am by Eric Goldman
 Essentially, if Bar-Z can prove as a matter of law that it had a legal right to interfere with a contract, then it has “conclusively established the justification defense, and the motive is irrelevant. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 9:11 am by Eric Goldman
LinkedIn Section 230 Preempts Another Facebook Account Termination Case–Zimmerman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 8:47 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Under F.S. 736.1008 a trustee can shorten the limitations period for a breach of trust claim to only 6 months “with respect to a matter that was adequately disclosed in a trust disclosure document” (think: trust accounting). [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 9:21 am by Eric Goldman
A coordinated effort between private and government actors to censor ideas, no matter how contentious or offensive those ideas may be, offends the First Amendment. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:56 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Barton Beebe, NYU, Aesthetic Progress and Intellectual Property LawWhat is the aesthetic? [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:57 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Substantively, there are only a couple of questions that really matter about the precedential implications of this ruling: 1) Will more 512(f) plaintiffs succeed in court? [read post]
5 Feb 2022, 7:45 am by Bill Marler
 The Good Story – When It Mattered Podcast Ep. 49 — Chitra Ragavan June 2020 2020 – Law360:  Bill Marler and COVID-19 , Jill Coffey May 29 2020 – An Exclusive Conversation with Foodborne Illness Attorney Bill Marler QA Magazine, Lisa Lupo, March/April 2020 – He helped make burgers safer, Now he is fighting food poisoning again, Washington Post, January 19 2018 – Bill Marler: 25 Years of Food Safety, Food Safety Magazine, May 8… [read post]