Search for: "J.A." Results 421 - 440 of 1,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2017, 6:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Thedistrict court denied Amgen’s motion, stating that thecell-culture information sought by Amgen had “essentially,no relevance to the patents that are asserted,” J.A. 37,a conclusion that Amgen does not now dispute.Amgen appealed the district court’s interlocutory order.Hospira then moved this court to dismiss Amgen’sappeal for lack of jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am by Barry Sookman
Groberman J.A. pointed to the international support for this approach:   I note that the courts of many other jurisdictions have found it necessary, in the context of orders against Internet abuses, to pronounce orders that have international effects. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See J.A. 84 (seeking $78,592.50 in attorneys’fees (including paralegal fees) and $33,103.89 in expertfees).1(...)The district court concluded that the “[a]ll expenses” provision of thestatute was neither sufficiently specific nor explicitenough for the authorization of attorneys’ fees under thisRule. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 7:37 am by John O'Sullivan
Writing for the court Feldman J.A. observed, “Had the client wished to exclude claims it might later discover arising from that work, it could have bargained for that result. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 4:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Blair J.A., at p. 722, also quoted Professor Fleming from The Law of Torts, (7th ed. 1987), at p. 450, as to the success of the reform brought to this area of the law by occupiers’ liability legislation: Its central feature was to abandon the timorous distinction between categories of entrants and subsume the law of occupiers to the unifying principle of a “common duty of care”. [read post]