Search for: "Jacobson v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 510
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2020, 5:00 am by Robert Klasfeld
Significantly, the Supreme Court has held that states can invoke such authority—within reason—to respond to a health crisis.In 1905, writing for the 7-2 majority in Jacobson v. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 6:07 pm by Eugene Volokh
In sum: on the record before it, the Court cannot conclude that ¶ 12(b) of EO 2020- 110 survives the deferential review it is due under Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 8:37 am by Guest Barista
In Qualitex v Jacobson, (this was briefly discussed in my earlier blog post of non traditional trademarks) Qualitex sought protection over the green gold colour of their cleansing pads. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm by Marcos Beaton
The principle that a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment can be traced back to Jacobson v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 6:13 am
Sullivan, Ropes & Gray LLP, on Sunday, January 17, 2016 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Derivatives, Investment Company Act, Investor protection, Leverage,Mutual funds, No-action letters, Private funds, Risk, Risk management, Rule 18f-4, SEC, SEC rulemaking, Securities Regulation, Swaps PECO v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Stronski, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, on Tuesday, July 11, 2023 Tags: Board composition, directors, Mergers & acquisitions, SEC enforcement, Shareholder activism, universal proxy rule X Corp. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 1:01 am
Barrett Posted by Warren S. de Wied, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP, on Wednesday, November 2, 2016 Tags: Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Duty of care, Duty of loyalty, Fiduciary duties, Merger litigation,Mergers & acquisitions [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]