Search for: "John Doe Defendants"
Results 421 - 440
of 11,437
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
While most people consider their banking and transaction records highly private, and highly revealing, the Court held that the defendant had no basis to object because “the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit the obtaining of information revealed to a third-party and conveyed by him to Government authorities. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:47 am
October 4, 2022); see also John L. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
Leibowitz Professor of Trial Techniques and Director of the Cornell Death Penalty Project, Cornell Law SchoolModerator: John Leubsdorf, Distinguished Professor of Law and Judge Frederick B. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 10:30 pm
Mancini in Case 294/93 Les Verts In memory of the late Professor John Usher Faced with the unprecedented and persistent backlash against its own authority coming from Poland, the Court of Justice finds itself in a delicate position: it is trapped between what is now clearly a counter-factual assertion (“common values”), on the one hand, and the pragmatic judicial path and mandate that binds the Court to the “community based on the rule law” mast against all odds, on… [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 6:07 am
Thus, defendants would suffer prejudice were the Doe plaintiffs permitted to proceed anonymously. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 2:06 am
Clark, a Justice Department lawyer under Trump, is a defendant in the Georgia election interference case. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
Justice Barrett’s view in Mallory would have had the opposite effect.So what does Mallory tell us about the current Court? [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 5:55 am
Tellingly, while the Obama administration retracted John Yoo’s infamous legal opinions on torture, Yoo’s equally problematic legal opinions on the use of force still stand. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 9:01 pm
” His lawyer, John Lauro, labelled the August 1 indictment brought by Special Counsel Jack Smith charging Trump with election interference as “an attack on free speech, and [on] political advocacy. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 5:01 am
There’s no substantive response to “John Doe was not credible and did it. [read post]
17 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
Does this act of accepting premiums negate the original grounds for denial? [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 12:30 pm
If you are going to tell a church that its proposed walking path on an undeveloped wooded plot requires the same regulatory rigmarole as a full church building, you might want to defend your choices in a brief that does not require the Sixth Circuit to distinguish between your arguments that "even attempt[] to address the merits" and those that do not. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 8:44 am
The record on the Barlow tomb does not fully record his many accomplishments, but you can only stick so much on a plaque. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Part 1 of this piece can be found here. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 4:54 am
The inquiry started roughly eight months before any indictments of defendants linked to the Watergate break-in. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 1:44 pm
In Texas, the offense of prostitution does not require that a sexual act actually be completed, but the law does require that a knowing agreement is present. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:33 am
To no one’s surprise, Trump’s lawyer in the Jack Smith January 6 case, John Lauro, has moved for Judge Tanya Chutkan to recuse herself based upon gratuitous statements made during her sentencing of other January 6 defendants. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 12:34 am
The Meadows ruling does not bode well for Trump, or for that matter any of the other defendants seeking removal to federal court. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
" The arguments in favor of lower court judges sitting on SCOTUS by designation may be harder to defend, but I do not think the requirement of one Supreme Court precludes Congress or the justices themselves from creating a plan to substitute for a recused justice a lower court judge. [read post]
8 Sep 2023, 7:36 am
Novell, Inc., which held that the bespeaks caution doctrine insulated a defendant from liability even though the defendant provided cautionary language in registration statements issued well before the allegedly false statements. [read post]
