Search for: "Jones v. Black*"
Results 421 - 440
of 852
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2016, 7:08 am
Glispie v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 4:58 am
U.S. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 5:41 am
Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
” State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
Jones.* Down the Tubes: H&M Breached Settlement Agreement by Infringing PatentJani analyses Stretchline Intellectual Properties Ltd v H&M Hennes & Mauritz UK Ltd [2015] EWHC 3298 (Pat), a decision that dealt with a UK patent concerning the tubular fabric in underwired garments such as brassieres.* Goodbye, good luck! [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 5:12 pm
Co. v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:57 am
BSI Enterprises Ltd & Another v Blue Mountain Music Ltd [2015] EWCA Civ 1151, a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling of 18 November 2015, is one of those decisions that looks as though it ought to be quite exciting because of its celebrity content but which actually has little or nothing to entertain the reader. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 9:18 am
Roberts ARTICLE [Re]Integrating Psychic Space: Law, Ontology, and the Ghosts of Old Savannah Anthony V. [read post]
25 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
https://t.co/hrhDHmkcVh -> AM v Toronto Police Service, A presumption of notice to the media for anonymization applications? [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:00 pm
Jones v. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 3:30 am
The case is called Jones v. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
There could be a third argument- i.e. that they both had the same idea, contributed significant relevant originality (Brighton v Jones [2004]) and, in fact, the selfies are works of joint authorship; there being collaboration present and no need for an intention to create a joint work (Beckingham v Hodgens [2002]). [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm
Jones, University of Wisconsin, “The Other Operation Dixie: PublicEmployees and the New Deal Order”David Bensman, Rutgers University, and Donna Kesselman, University of Paris, EstCreteil, “From the New Deal Standard Employment Relationship to EmploymentGrey Zone”Commentator and Chair: Bob Master, Communications Workers of AmericaThe Politics of Regulation In and Beyond the New Deal Order Paul Sabin, Yale University, “Environmental Law and the End of the New… [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 8:34 am
” Arguing the line-item veto case as Solicitor General immediately after the Supreme Court announced Clinton v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 8:31 am
In order to be protected by the Jones Act, the Supreme Court rule in Chandris, Inc., v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:00 am
Kraemer, which held that racially restrictive covenants could not be enforced by courts; Jones v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 8:44 am
Kraemer, which held that racially restrictive covenants could not be enforced by courts; Jones v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 7:32 am
Kraemer, which held that racially restrictive covenants could not be enforced by courts; Jones v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 4:05 pm
Caroline Lucas, the Green Party MP for Brighton Pavilion, Green Party member Jenny Jones, and George Galloway, the former MP for Bradford West, have brought the legal challenge in the IPT. [read post]
