Search for: "Kennedy Jackson"
Results 421 - 440
of 763
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2014, 9:30 pm
Thomas Jackson, University of North Carolina at Greensboro and Virginia Foundation for the HumanitiesKent Germany, University of South CarolinaModerator: Claudrena Harold, University of Virginia Department of HistoryCold War Civil Rights and Human RightsScholars have recently explored from many angles the intersection of domestic and international politics and policies during the civil rights revolution. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 1:15 pm
Only Justice Kennedy appeared to recognize that the rights of employees do matter. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 6:17 am
., on behalf of the federal government, began his argument with a quote from Justice Jackson in Prince v Massachusetts, although it was not a part of the Court’s 1943 opinion: “Limitations which of necessity bound religious freedom begin to operate whenever activities begin to affect or collide with the liberties of others or of the public. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:46 am
But this is no joke, and Kennedy has a lot in mind. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:53 pm
Missouri announced it would go with propofol, which successfully (if unintentionally) killed Michael Jackson. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:00 am
Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University, on "The Slowdown in the Economic Assimilation of Immigrants: Aging and Cohort Effects Revisited Again." [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 3:33 pm
Goldwater is reelected in 1972, defeating Hubert Humphrey (who has Scoop Jackson as his VP).In 1976, Bobby Kennedy is the Democratic nominee (with Walter Mondale as VP), and he wins, defeating William Miller (who has Bob Dole as his VP). [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 10:46 am
Father and Mother were initiating divorce proceedings, which 'raises thelevel of stress for both parents.' . . .On November 30, 2012, DCFS filed a section 300 petition on behalf of Aiden and Elizabeth, alleging under section 300, subdivision (b) that Mother had mental and emotional problems, including delusional behavior, auditory hallucinations, suicidal ideation, and a suicide attempt, which render Mother incapable of providing regular care of the minors; in August 2012, Mother was involuntarily… [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:43 pm
After consuming several pages discussing the interests of the states in controlling family law, Justice Kennedy expressly states that the Court is not relying strictly on federalism. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:07 am
” As we reported previously, lawyers from the small firm representing Michael Jackson’s family think O’Melveny & Myers is full of d-bags. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
Kennedy, Roger. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 1:31 pm
Jackson Bd. of Ed., 476 U.S.267, 280, n. 6 (1986). [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 10:03 pm
Bitey: I think you mean Andrew Jackson, Snapster. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Justice Kennedy's opinion in Windsor (press coverage here and here) studiously avoids using the familiar concepts of levels of scrutiny and fundamental rights. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:02 pm
(Here Kennedy cites the 1986 plurality opinion in Wygant v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:38 am
As noted, the laws at issue in CBOCS, Jackson, and Gómez-Pérez were broad, general bars on discrimination. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Or, at least, not like this, said justices Roberts, Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Alito, and Sotomayor in an opinion released today. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 12:32 pm
Jackson, a case concerning whether evidence in a criminal case had been wrongfully admitted, the Court held that there was no clear Supreme Court precedent for excluding the evidence. [read post]
