Search for: "Larson" Results 421 - 440 of 1,626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2008, 9:29 pm
In other news, I am reading for fun Erik Larson's "Thunderstruck," and am extremely excited to find a $3 copy of a Nathaniel West two-fer novella set that I hadn't read before. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 10:39 pm
  Carlton Larson, The Revolutionary American Jury:   A Case Study of the 1778-1779 Philadelphia Treason Trials, 61 SMU L. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 5:05 am by Gerard Magliocca
I want to give a shout-out to new book by my friend Carlton Larson that will be coming out soon. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 7:22 pm by Patent Docs
Paul Berghoff of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert Berghoff LLP, Greg Castanias of Jones Day, and Wendy Larson of Pirkey Barber PLLC will provide a roundup of this year's most significant intellectual property cases, review the most significant decisions as of June 30, and give a sneak peek at coming attractions. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:32 pm
“If your streets are anywhere close to east or west, my default statement is you’re going to have a ‘henge,’” Shane Larson, an astronomer at the Adler Planetarium in Chicago, told The New York Times last year. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:53 pm by Patent Docs
Paul Berghoff of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, Gregory Castanias of Jones Day, and Wendy Larson of Pirkey Barber will cover recent developments in case law over the past six months, including notable decisions issued by the lower tribunals in the first half of the year. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 2:01 am by Jen Patja Howell
Alvaro Marañon sat down with Erik Larson, a computer scientist, tech entrepreneur and author of the new book, "The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can't Think the Way We Do. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 8:06 pm by Patent Docs
Paul Berghoff of McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP, Gregory Castanias of Jones Day, and Wendy Larson of Pirkey Barber will review the most significant decisions as of 2022 and give a sneak peek at coming attractions. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 12:56 pm by The Editors
Diane Flannery and Annie Cai Larson provide their thoughts below on a Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decision from earlier this year that held a counterclaim-defendant could not rely on CAFA to avoid state court. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 5:03 pm by Gerard Magliocca
Finally, there is Carlton Larson's new on treason during the Revolutionary War, entitled The Trials of Allegiance. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:27 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Larson and Hye-Chung Kum are faculty at the school of public health and the law school at Texas A&M University with expertise in health information regulation, data science and online contracts. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:52 am by Sarena
Larson manages to combine a likeable, yet believable character, with good writing and really out of the box imagining. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 12:42 pm by Rhett Larson
I never post under the angsting thread provided here at Prawfsblawg for those submitting articles for law review publication. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
Sometimes it pays to be in the minority.This is about the closest vote you'll ever see in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 11:45 am by Andrea K. Schneider
Elizabeth Larson and Melissa Fischer won the ABA Representation in Mediation Regional Competition at the John Marshall Law School on February 16th. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 10:12 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Larson, Murder Will Out: Rethinking the Right of Publicity through One Classic Case A really interesting story about the right-of-publicity fallout from the Leopold and Loeb case, providing a dramatic demonstration of the speech-suppressive effect of the right of publicity: Levin described the chilling effect of the action on writers and publishers: Nathan Leopold’s lawsuit seemed to spark a whole series of astounding cases. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 1:30 pm
Three businesses affected, U-Haul Co. of Minnesota, Larson’s Automotive Repair Services and Competition Engines Inc., objected to the condemnation because it wasn’t supported by findings of public purpose or necessity and that the city’s use of the “quick-take” procedure was improper. [read post]