Search for: "Lock v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 3,926
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2021, 3:44 am
On this record, triable issues of fact exist as to whether, but for defendant’s failure to inform plaintiff’s principal that it could be locked into the sale agreement in perpetuity if it did not obtain municipal approval for redevelopment, it would not have entered into the contract as written and would have avoided litigation with the buyer who sued for specific performance (see Leggiadro, Ltd. v Winston & Strawn, LLP, 151 AD3d 413 [1st Dept… [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 3:06 pm
See also Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Thanks to Eugene for inviting me to blog about the historical arguments made by the State of New York and its supporting amici in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 1:01 am
” Another case Arthur won, Lemmon v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 12:34 pm
Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2021, 5:20 am
In Prakash Singh v. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 4:25 pm
Instead, they are sealed up, and locked away in a special safe, under a longstanding practice discussed and explained in a recent case. [read post]
28 Sep 2021, 9:05 am
Entrepreneur Media, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 9:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2021, 2:48 pm
Brown v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 2:01 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 2:01 am
Jane Doe v. [read post]
Proposed Michigan Bill Banning Discrimination Based on Hair Texture and Race-based Hairstyles Stalls
14 Sep 2021, 8:56 pm
The case, EEOC v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 10:17 am
When he tried to return to the property on 11 May 2021, he found the locks had been changed and Dr N was living in the property. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 6:00 am
The study was requested by Congress in the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2020 Allen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 8:25 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 6:19 am
In this article, Bryant v Parkland School Division, 2021 ABQB 391, a case in which the plaintiffs sought more money on termination than what their contracts provided, is discussed. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
A key element of the tariff question is the meaning of Section 68.2(1) of the Copyright Act which states: 68.2 (1) Without prejudice to any other remedies available to it, a collective society may, for the period specified in its approved tariff, collect the royalties specified in the tariff and, in default of their payment, recover them in a court of competent jurisdiction. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
