Search for: "Long v. District Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 22,264
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2022, 11:23 pm
The post Supreme Court Lets Kentucky AG Intervene in Cameron v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 8:10 am
Lanier, Nos. 16-6655/6657.The Supreme Court's decision in Remmer v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
In Gonzales v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
District Court Permits Ex Part Communication with Former Employee and Co-Inventor of Plaintiff But Orders Defendants to Turn Over Certain Email Communications by Stan Gibson and Julia Consoli-Tiensvold In ICM Controls Corp. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 2:21 pm
District Court Permits Ex Parte Communication with Former Employee and Co-Inventor of Plaintiff But Orders Defendants to Turn Over Certain Email Communications by Stan Gibson and Julia Consoli-Tiensvold In ICM Controls Corp. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
This issue was explored by the Court of Appeal in KU v Liverpool City Council [2005] EWCA Civ 475, where it was determined that a Court did not have the power to award different success fees for different periods in a claim where the CFA itself did not provide for the same:"The approach of the district judge negates the whole purpose of assessing at the outset the risks involved in pursuing a claim. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 7:37 am
Ben Cooper sends along an eye-opening decision, Hodge v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 1:43 pm
USA v. [read post]
24 Jan 2020, 4:15 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Texas ruling awarding VirnetX nearly $440 million. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:19 am
After a long jury trial, Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:14 am
In Leeson v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 7:00 am
In Albemarle Corporation v. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 9:59 am
District Court Judge Singal entered an order on April 12, 2011, in Fitzpatrick v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:23 pm
Cir.2013)) (obviousness).Because the district court’s claim constructions were based solely on theintrinsic record, the Supreme Court’s recentdecision in Teva does not require us to review the district court’sclaim construction any differently than under thede novo standard we have long applied.Fenner Invs., Ltd. v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:56 am
On May 22, 2017, by a vote of 5-2, the Supreme Court of Ohio dismissed Rush v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 9:25 am
A student at Little Rock’s Central High School Fifty-seven years after the Supreme Court’s Brown v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 6:10 am
The district court ruing is affirmed. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 6:07 pm
Reporter Kendall Hatch has a piece in The Metrowest Daily News considering the long-term implications of the Supreme Judicial Court's recent ruling in the open meeting law case, District Attorney for the Northern District v. [read post]
