Search for: "Long v. Perry"
Results 421 - 440
of 789
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2012, 8:23 am
The ban was determined unconstitutional in 2010 in Perry v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 11:12 am
24 Hour Fitness, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:37 pm
” The American Foundation for Equal Rights (AFER) is the sole sponsor of Perry v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 2:51 am
What the 5th Circuit did, in Ibarra v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
In the wake of NFIB v. [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 6:37 pm
In Perry v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 11:22 am
* Is the long-running Perfect 10 v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:48 am
Perry v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am
Georgia; another slippery opinion by Chief Justice Marshall.1832: Jackson is reelected and carries the House of Representatives, which establishes the Democrats as the leading party until the Civil War.1932: FDR is elected in a landslide that realigns the country in favor of Democrats1933: The Hundred Days Legislation is enacted and is followed by a third-party challenge on the left led by Huey Long (and others).1935: The Supreme Court upholds the gold devaluation of… [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 8:28 am
Perry, 548 U.S. 399, 413-414 (2006) (Kennedy, J.) [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
" Perry v. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:44 pm
In a time of budget cuts -- including cuts directed against public employees -- Griggsville Perry Community Unit School District v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 7:59 am
Perry v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 12:37 pm
” Writing for the majority in Perry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:06 am
These cases played a starring role in the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Perry v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:02 am
Lone Wolf v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 12:17 pm
" Now, we've known for a long time that en banc decisions are more likely to be reviewed by the Supreme Court; as H.W. [read post]
17 May 2012, 10:06 am
The Fourth Amendment prohibits “unreasonable searches and seizures” and in Terry v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:16 am
’ Shields Pork Plus, Inc. v. [read post]
