Search for: "MATTER OF J L F H A F"
Results 421 - 440
of 600
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2018, 11:22 am
First, in the CPTPP, Article 25.11 states that the Parties do not have recourse to dispute settlement "for any matter arising under" the regulatory coherence chapter. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 11:46 am
(See Exhibit L.) [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(j) Open and notorious adultery or fornication. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
L. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:56 pm
L. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
L. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 11:43 pm
., the lack of an initial sound) and 21 consonants: b, p, m, f, d, t, n, lz, c, s, zh, ch, sh, r g, k, h, j, q, x The boldfaced, underlined consonants pose a challenge for the native speaker of English, but later I'll explain a way to think about them that I find useful. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 4:26 pm
Normal 0 0 1 2970 16934 The University of Chicago 141 33 20796 11.1282 0 0 0 I. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
., J. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am
[The statute immunizes computer services for "action voluntarily taken in good faith to restrict ... availability of material that the provider ... considers to be obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable, whether or not such material is constitutionally protected"—but what exactly does that mean?] [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am
Department of Justice (June 16, 2023) Government motion for a protective order limiting the disclosure of discovery information (June 16, 2023) Garcia Hearings Paperless order granting in part Government motion for Garcia hearings regarding Nauta, De Oliveira and counsel (Sept. 25, 2025) Government reply in support of Garcia hearing regarding De Oliveira and counsel (Sept. 6, 2023) De Oliveira opposition to government motion for a Garcia hearing (Aug. 30, 2023) Government response to Nauta motion to… [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:45 am
L. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 12:00 pm
L. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 3:41 pm
A non-exhaustive list appears in Article 43:(a) the license fee;(b) upfront payment;(c) milestone payment;(d) royalty;(e) research and development funding;(f) joint ownership of intellectual property;(g) employment opportunity;(h) participation of Zambian nationals, the Agency or appropriate institution designated by the Agency in the research, and developm [read post]
16 May 2019, 10:21 am
Roy J. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
L. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
”[24] The court continued by observing that: [H]ere, the Provision is used by an agency of the federal government to shield itself from public view. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:00 pm
the Domestic Policy Council; and l. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 7:53 am
J. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
As my article notes, courts do make exceptions to the litigate-in-your-own-name rule, and there are plausible arguments that pseudonymous litigation should be more commonly allowed; but this is still a good articulation of the dominant view: Pilots X, Y, Z, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, & M sued Boeing about its 737 MAX airplanes. [read post]
