Search for: "MATTER OF T F"
Results 421 - 440
of 13,928
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The Board went on: “However, this does not mean that i f R 64 (a) is not or not correctly met then A 107 first sentence will necessarily not be complied with” (idem). [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:36 pm
Maritime Administrator (thanks to InstaPundit for the pointer): [F]or the fourth time in a row, and during the worst shipping crisis of the century, the US Department of Transportation, has appointed someone to the US Maritime Administration (MARAD) who is not a captain and has no commercial shipping experience. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 3:01 pm
Consequently the difference features set out above do not have a technical effect (going beyond those inherent in running any computer program) and thus lack technical character and cannot contribute to inventive step; see T 154/04, [5(F)].[5.5] According to the appellant in the statement of grounds of appeal, various decisions had found that improvements of the sort achieved in the present case involved an inventive step; see T 605/93, T 333/95 and T… [read post]
5 Jun 2008, 3:49 am
., 448 F.3d 1324, 1333 n.3 (Fed. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 8:21 am
The following contribution to our arbitration symposium is written by Terry F. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm
T 1068/07), this board, albeit in a different composition, acknowledged that the subject-matter of the disclaimer present now in claim 1 of the main request was disclosed in the application as filed. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
T is for Tax Treaty. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 1:13 am
This embryo was not viable and required embryo rescue and regeneration.The meiosis in the regenerated F1 plant (grown from the rescued embryo) which preceded the back-crossing step f) of the claimed method was distorted. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 12:00 pm
., In re Dresser, 972 F.2d 540 (5th Cir. 1992). [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 10:28 am
., David F. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 10:59 am
Judge Joseph F. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:16 pm
“[I]t is the specification itselfthat must demonstrate possession. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:46 pm
Int’l, LLC, 634 F. [read post]
29 May 2007, 5:35 am
Gonzales, ___ F.3d ___, No. 05-2800, 2007 WL 1153033, at *3 (1st Cir. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 7:17 am
The taking into account of this argument necessarily leads to the consideration of the applicant's argumentation concerning the inventive step of the subject-matter of claim 1. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
”In examples A to F that follow mixtures of imidacloprid with different fungicidal active compounds are used. [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am
In a another Board decision (T 777/15), this was denied. [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 4:49 am
That is emphatically not what McWhorter says:O’Rourke’s “F-bomb,” then, was less a matter of swearing than his seeking a note of sincerity. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am
A 84 stipulates that the claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 5:47 pm
That doesn’t a patent app can’t be filed or a patent issued. [read post]
