Search for: "MRS. BRANCH"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 5:21 pm
" Mr. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
It would sink the economy and imperil Mr. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Mr. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 7:29 am
’ I hope more lawyers say to chief executives, ‘Mr. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:14 am
Before the 2016 election, Mr. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 11:01 pm
As I’ve often said before, if it were up to me, I’d have the executive branch pick judges with legislative confirmation, followed by a California-style retention election every few years in which there would be an up or down vote on the incumbent. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 6:00 am
The judge found that “the purpose of transferring Mr. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:01 am
But, as Foreign Policy recently reported, the administration is now proposing to do away with informal arms sale notifications that the executive branch has traditionally submitted to Congress well before arms sales are finalized. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 9:30 am
Rather, UT provided the exclusive license to “Mr. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 12:32 am
The trustee’s asset management powers were delegated to the Geneva branch of Credit Suisse AG (“the Bank”). [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:30 pm
The reason that a remand for rehearing was appropriate in Booker (despite the retroactivity of the severance) was that the prior statutory misrepresentation of law clearly made a difference, in that it led to Mr. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 5:45 am
Like his predecessors, Mr. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 3:29 am
Cornell Law Professor Josh Chafetz Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 5:54 am
Chief Justice Roberts held that such a requirement interfered with a president’s power to supervise the executive branch, because a sole director with for-cause protection would have held too much concentrated power independent from presidential control. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 12:13 am
Trump cries “fake news,” while Mr. [read post]
29 Jun 2020, 2:13 pm
Failing what would be an unwarranted intervention by an appellate court, Mr. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 10:43 am
Code § 1001 This statute defines a federal crime as 1) knowingly and willfully; 2) making any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; 3) in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the United States. [read post]
25 Jun 2020, 8:36 am
Even if a court of appeals could grant a mandamus petition based upon an injury to a party (here, the Executive Branch) that hasn’t asked for mandamus relief on its own behalf—something the law doesn’t allow—this would hardly be the ideal case in which to do so because, contrary to the majority opinion, the Attorney General and the Department of Justice wouldn’t be injured by the Judge Sullivan’s unexceptional decision to convene a hearing on the… [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm
Mr. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 10:55 am
Finally, there's the issue of which branch of the U.S. government should be in charge here. [read post]
