Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,005
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
The Ontario courts have followed the UK decision of Letterstedt v. [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:48 pm
Center For Biological Diversity, et al. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 5:46 am
The Minnesota Court of Appeals issued an opinion in State v. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 6:37 am
On November 1 Superior Court Judge Lawrence Jones, in hearing Dudas v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 6:50 am
The defendant was convicted in district court and appealed to superior court. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 8:54 am
Superior Court of San Francisco City held that the SCA prohibits criminal defendants from doing the same to build their defense case before trial. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 8:13 am
In August, Pennsylvania’s Superior Court handed down a ruling in Pringle v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:11 am
” “The closest parallel is a Ninth Circuit case called Ellis v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
In Alden v Maine, 527 US 706, the Supreme Court of the United States found that State sovereign immunity is "implicit in the constitutional design. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 3:00 am
Pazol v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, the justices reversed a state court finding of specific personal jurisdiction over out-of-state plaintiffs in a multistate lawsuit. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:12 am
The Supreme Court in Surya Devi Rai v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
” Harassment law divided into two main questions: Did actionable harassment occur? [read post]
7 Aug 2016, 6:57 am
Gould v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 5:14 am
Spoerle v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 7:12 am
Superior Court of Los Angeles County (Watson) (1975) 13 Cal. 3d 652, 658; see also San Diego Unified Port District v. [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Ted has previously written about Canadian cases dealing with the issue of service of process under the Hague Service Convention, including a recent post on the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision in Khan Resources, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 1:11 am
"Preliminary" means that the ECJ answers the question, and then the national court resumes its proceedings and enters its judgment, as opposed to a traditional appeal from a final judgment.When I saw the question referred to the ECJ, I already noticed that it was very well written, and I wish the Dusseldorf Regional Court had done a similarly good job in that Nokia v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:12 am
The government’s Newman petition relied heavily on a 1983 Supreme Court decision in Dirks v. [read post]
