Search for: "Major v. Georgia" Results 421 - 440 of 1,956
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[24] Courts in Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Tennessee, Texas, and Virginia do not enforce Type II agreements and only enforce Type I agreements.[25] Other jurisdictions enforce both Type I and Type II agreements as binding. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 1:31 pm
  I have been writing about the fundamental shift in the focus of human rights and human rights discourse, from one framed in the discursive tropes of liberal democratic ideology to one framed in an emerging Marxist-Leninist discourse (Backer, Larry Catá, ‘By Dred Things I am Compelled’: China and the Challenge to International Human Rights Law and Policy (January 15, 2020). [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 10:30 am by Amy Howe
On March 2, the justices will hear oral argument in a major voting-rights dispute from Arizona. [read post]
13 Dec 2020, 8:26 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This is significant because the substantive claims in Wisconsin are parallel to the substantive claims made about the elections in Michigan, Georgia, and Pennsylvania in various suits, including Texas v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by Schachtman
He treated the four states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as independent tests, which of course they are not. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 1:53 pm by admin
He treated the four states, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, as independent tests, which of course they are not. [read post]