Search for: "Martinez v. Day" Results 421 - 440 of 616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2012, 2:53 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
To succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1), the documentary evidence relied on by the defendant must "conclusively establish[ ] a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law" (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 6:05 am by John Hochfelder
New York City Transit Authority (1st Dept. 2005) - $980,000 for 56 year old woman with comminuted, midshaft humeral fracture [we previously discussed this case in our article on humerus fracture cases, here] Martinez v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 8:24 am by Don Cruse
Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice and Miguel Martinez v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 3:51 am by Russ Bensing
  In Schatzer, Court holds that any break of 14 days or more ends requirement. [read post]
As you probably know, a couple of days ago the Supreme Court decided Christian Legal Society of Hastings College of the Law v. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:48 pm by Amy Howe
., a student who was born with cerebral palsy and whose mobility is impaired, was the catalyst for the first oral argument of the day, in Fry v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm by Kate Howard
Carpenter 15-1193Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 5:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Per Curiam Opinion Links to pdf version of opinion and to Electronic Briefs in this case can be found on the Texas Supreme Court's web site   Americo Life, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar and Jason Mazzone
”A centerpiece of Dean Martinez’s plan to better educate students (as well as, perhaps, staff) about “freedom of speech [at Stanford] and the norms of the legal profession” is a mandatory half-day educational programming before the end of the current academic year. [read post]