Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2015, 12:00 pm
Handa, 103 A.D.2d 794, 477 N.Y.S.2d 670, lv. denied 64 N.Y.2d 1040; Roy v. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:39 am
Town of Patterson Zoning Bd. of Appeals, 43 A.D.3d 926, 929, 841 N.Y.S.2d 650 [2007]; see Matter of Cohen v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 1:05 pm
Kaplun, 274 A.D.2d 293, 298 (2d Dep’t, 2000). [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
Joyanna U. (64 A.D.3d 1092, 1093-1095 [2009] ) and Matter of Lewis v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:28 am
Lipsig, 92 A.D.2d 536, 459 N.Y.S.2d 98, 99 (N.Y. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:09 pm
However, where a defendant chooses instead to proceed to trial on his or her traffic matter, J. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
–––Jasmine D.], 165 A.D.3d 476, 85 N.Y.S.3d 430 [1st Dept. 2018]). [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 6:12 am
[Christopher F.], 74 A.D.3d 1454, 1455 [2010]; Matter of Stampfler v. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 2:37 pm
Consistent with these principles, CPLR article 75 provides for the vacatur of an arbitration award based upon the partiality of an arbitrator only when the challenged arbitrator was "appointed as a neutral" (CPLR 7511[b][1][ii]; see Matter of Meehan v Nassau Community Coll., 243 A.D.2d 12, 17-18 [1998], lv denied 92 N.Y.2d 814 [1998]). [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:38 pm
The Matter of Sharp, 68 A.D.3d 1182 (N.Y. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 4:45 am
Saratoga County, 234 A.D.2d 764, the Appellate Division said that "persons who are personally or extensively involved in the disciplinary process should disqualify themselves from reviewing the recommendations of a Hearing Officer and from acting on the charges," citing a number of decisions including Matter of Lowy v Carter, 210 AD2d 408, Matter of Hicks v Fortier, 117 AD2d 930; and Matter of Ortiz v Lesser, 83 AD2d 663. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Such was the case in Mallon v Parness, 167 A.D.2d 614. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 4:00 am
” Waldeck v NYC Employees' Retirement System, 81 N.Y.2d 804 [181 A.D.2d 412] decided with Barbaro v NYC Employees' Retirement System, [181 A.D.2d 437] addresses a similar situation involving members of the NYC Sanitation Workers' Retirement System. ** See General Municipal Law §207-k The decision is posted on the Internet at: http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2013/2013_51252.htm. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am
Terrance J. ,96 A.D.3d 482, 945 N.Y.S.2d 693 (1st Dept); Matter of Brazie v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 2:30 pm
This issue was discussed recently in an appellate case from the 14th Court of Appeals in In the Interest of A.D. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 7:28 am
Co., 112 A.D.3d 794, (N.Y. [read post]
26 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
Moskovits, 58 A.D.3d 671, 873 N.Y.S. 2d 320 [2″d. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:34 am
. *** In other words, even in the absence of any direct grant of legislative power, Supreme Court has the “inherent authority…to fashion whatever remedies are required for the resolution of justiciable disputes and the protection of the rights of citizens,” tempered only by our Constitution and statutes (Matter of AT&T Info. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 8:38 am
Jennings, 140 A.D. 3d 526 (1st Dept. 2016), the First Department (an appeals court), found that the defendant in fact violated New York Penal Law 155.05[2](e). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
259 A.D.2d 1004 (4th Dept.1999). [read post]
