Search for: "Matter of A.D"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,064
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 5:45 pm
However, in the case of Matter of Mergenhagen (50 A.D.3d 1486 1488, 856 N.Y.S.2d 389) the Surrogate may disqualify an individual from receiving letters of administration where friction or hostility between such individual and a beneficiary or a co-administrator or co-administratrix, especially where such individual is at fault, interferes with the proper administration of the estate, and future cooperation is unlikely. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:38 am
., 86 A.D.3d 32, 38 (1st Dept 2011) (quoting Brian v. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 4:38 am
., 86 A.D.3d 32, 38 (1st Dept 2011) (quoting Brian v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:26 am
The Supreme Court cited the Matter of Auguste v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:33 pm
., 36 A.D.2d 20, 21, 318 N.Y.S.2d 249, 250 (1st Dept. 1971). [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 9:34 pm
" It is the established Class I ratio upon which they relied in the instant matters. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 9:35 pm
DeJesus, 21 A.D.2d 236, 250 N.Y.S.2d 317. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:30 am
” Indeed, in Doctor v New York State Office of Alcoholism & Substance Abuse Services, 112 A.D.3d 1020, the court said that hearsay evidence alone may constitute substantial evidence in an administrative hearing.In contrast, hearsay testimony is typically barred in a criminal trial. [read post]
21 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
Lodder and A.D. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 3:37 pm
MVAIC, 16 A.D.2d 35, 224 N.Y.S.2d 909, aff'd 12 N.Y.2d 922, 238 N.Y.S.2d 101, 188 N.E.2d 405. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
*The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s decision and remanded the matter “for further consideration” as the Supreme Court “never reached the merits of Plaintiff’s petition. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
*The Appellate Division reversed the Supreme Court’s decision and remanded the matter “for further consideration” as the Supreme Court “never reached the merits of Plaintiff’s petition. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:00 am
”* Cardo v Sielaff, 186 A.D.2d 424 The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2015/2015_04369.htm [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:05 pm
Under these circumstances, it is clear that a dispositional hearing was necessary in this matter. [read post]
27 May 2015, 12:05 pm
Under these circumstances, it is clear that a dispositional hearing was necessary in this matter. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Kenneth D., 213 A.D.2d 714, 624 N.Y.S.2d 455; Matter of Victor James L., 208 A.D.2d 403, 618 N.Y.S.2d 213; Matter of Travis Lee G., 169 A.D.2d 769, 565 N.Y.S.2d 136). [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Kenneth D., 213 A.D.2d 714, 624 N.Y.S.2d 455; Matter of Victor James L., 208 A.D.2d 403, 618 N.Y.S.2d 213; Matter of Travis Lee G., 169 A.D.2d 769, 565 N.Y.S.2d 136). [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:00 pm
Handa, 103 A.D.2d 794, 477 N.Y.S.2d 670, lv. denied 64 N.Y.2d 1040; Roy v. [read post]
26 May 2015, 12:00 pm
Handa, 103 A.D.2d 794, 477 N.Y.S.2d 670, lv. denied 64 N.Y.2d 1040; Roy v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:00 pm
Handa, 103 A.D.2d 794, 477 N.Y.S.2d 670, lv. denied 64 N.Y.2d 1040; Roy v. [read post]
