Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,626
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2019, 12:28 pm
The justices specialized in different class-action subject matter, as is evident in the graph below. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 11:00 am
They write the bankruptcy laws. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 4:06 am
” At Bloomberg Law, Kimberly Robinson reports that “[t]he order … could be the end of the misconduct controversy as the decision upheld the conclusion of a special panel of judges from the U.S. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
The question, of course, is will the court take up this invitation to revisit Roe? [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 5:55 am
The question often arises as to whether health insurance will cover post-resolution incurred expenses. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 1:20 am
The Federal Circuit reversed, however, holding that Samsung was entitled to judgment as a matter of law on invalidity because the jury was required to accept the purportedly credible, “unrebutted,” and “uncontradicted” testimony of Samsung’s paid expert. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 9:10 am
The appellate court went on to fault the trial court for failing to make sufficiently explicit findings as to whether the questioned meta-analysis was unreliable. [read post]
9 Jul 2019, 10:53 am
Indeed, from the cases I see, local law enforcement officials are especially quick to delete critical posts from constituents. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:48 pm
")And so that ought to be the end of the matter, right? [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 8:55 pm
The law is the law, and should be in the public domain, right?? [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Merrill is the Charles Evans Hughes Professor at Columbia Law School. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:24 pm
And, worse yet, some seem destined to have cert denied outright. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 8:46 am
Cert. denied. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 12:46 pm
“The court explained that the 14th Amendment required ‘that the law in the states shall be the same as for the black as for the white. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 12:47 pm
With only four votes needed to grant cert., why did Breyer end up standing alone in this instance? [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm
But the U.S. was a full partner: It authorized the entire scheme, allowing the parties to escape the antitrust laws. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am
The subject matter is sufficiently dense and difficult that the relist may have been necessary just so the justices could plow through the page-long question presented. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am
Even the overwhelming evidence of Bethlehem’s awareness of asbestosis hazards throughout the plaintiff’s employment was thus, questionably, deemed irrelevant. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am
Should it be based on how the highest court ruled on the matter, which would then—on the particular waiver issue in this example-- result in a tie between the State of Texas (based state common law) and the Fifth Circuit (based on federal common law).Or should the counting and coding be based on how different courts ruled regardless of whether they were ultimately reversed? [read post]
17 May 2019, 4:53 pm
Some of my Cato colleagues have filed an amicus brief in support of the cert petition. [read post]
