Search for: "Matter of Kahn"
Results 421 - 440
of 498
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2018, 1:07 pm
James Phillips, University of Iowa College of Law 1979, is a shareholder with Godfrey and Kahn in Milwaukee where he practices in the areas of domestic and international tax structuring, planning and controversy matters, corporate and business law, acquisitions and venture capital. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 8:13 pm
Kahn, himself a “progressive” Democrat explains why: When a commission is responsible for the performance of an industry, it is under never completely escapable pressure to protect the health of the companies it regulates, to assure a desirable performance by relying on those monopolistic chosen instruments and its own controls rather than on the unplanned and unplannable forces of competition. [...] [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
" The court, she continues, "having obtained jurisdiction of the parties and subject matter in this action must adapt its relief to the exigencies of the case. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 5:10 pm
See, e.g., Kahn v. [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 7:16 am
Of course, with a mandatory life sentence, it hardly matters in the end. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 4:59 am
‘In these circumstances, it is for the jury to determine whether an ordinary reader would have understood the article as a factual assertion…’” Kahn v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 6:09 am
” Chair Khan’s Public Statements Further evidence of the agencies’ hostility toward mergers comes from FTC Chair Lina Kahn’s own statements. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:07 pm
James Phillips, University of Iowa College of Law 1979, is a shareholder with Godfrey and Kahn in Milwaukee where he practices in the areas of domestic and international tax structuring, planning and controversy matters, corporate and business law, acquisitions and venture capital. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 6:50 pm
When do you want a product built with it, and when does it not matter? [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 12:48 pm
” However, he acknowledged that most matters would be resolved through settlements. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:53 pm
In addition to describing those situations in which a shareholder would be deemed controlling, relying on Kahn v. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 10:26 am
Further, “the motivation-to-combine analysis ‘need not seek out precise teachings directed to the specific subject matter of the challenged claim, for a court can take account of the inferences and creative steps that a person of ordinary skill in the art would employ. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 11:53 am
The court held that where, as here, the parents of children are alive, Domestic Relations Law § 72 gives grandparents the right to seek visitation only where, as a threshold matter, they can establish circumstances in which “equity would see fit to intervene,” i.e., that equitable circumstances exist. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 1:07 pm
James Phillips, University of Iowa College of Law 1979, is a shareholder with Godfrey and Kahn in Milwaukee where he practices in the areas of domestic and international tax structuring, planning and controversy matters, corporate and business law, acquisitions and venture capital. [read post]
4 May 2010, 6:09 am
” I can quote it from memory because definitions matter in real estate transactions, which are governed by written organizational and financing documents. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 7:19 am
The old, and still current, expectation was that you would be readily available to clients no matter what. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 6:04 am
While the dust plume scattered across many miles, the level of carcinogenic matter in the plume dissipated with time and distance. [read post]
3 Jun 2024, 4:31 am
The lion’s share of cases we write about on New York Business Divorce involve consummated business relationships where the warring parties have clearly chosen the particular entity form governing their relations, whether it be partnership, corporation, or limited liability company. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be represented, was suspended when they rebelled, and… [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:11 am
Justice Ginsburg kicked off the Court's questioning, eventually asking whether petitioner's arguments would hold up under the Federal Circuit's most recent decisions on obviousness - In re Kahn, Alza Corp. v. [read post]
