Search for: "Matter of State of New York v William D." Results 421 - 440 of 557
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2011, 6:00 am by Mark Fenster
Political payback against a state employee who had started a blog specifically to fight on behalf of organized public sector labor and who had published an op-ed in the New York Times? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
There I was at John Hochfelder’s New York Injury Cases Blog doing research on damages, before I turned to the usual suspects of Westlaw or the New York Jury Verdict Reporter.I'm not sure if Turk picks up the phone to call people to get information on damages as well, but that would take an awful long time and he'd have to call an awful lot of folk. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:06 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Sing Sing in New York.The place where in People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:03 am by Bruce E. Boyden
He goes out of his way to point out that the Demetriades decision was issued by a court that, although within the confines of the Southern District of New York, was in fact located in White Plains. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:59 am by Bruce Boyden
He goes out of his way to point out that the Demetriades decision was issued by a court that, although within the confines of the Southern District of New York, was in fact located in White Plains. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 7:07 am by Mandelman
  New York State courts had already ruled and a foreclosure judgment was issued, so now U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 6:29 am by David G. Badertscher
Williams, 3573/73 FREE WITH REGISTRATIONNEW YORK COUNTYAdministrative Law Waterfront Commission's Decision to Remove Longshoremen From Register to Work Upheld Matter of Cambio v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 1:00 pm by Mary A. Fischer
  On October 13, a new battle over post-conviction DNA testing begins as the Supreme Court hears arguments in Skinner v. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
§ 2254(d) and this Court’s precedent permit federal habeas corpus relief on a claim that a state judge unconstitutionally “coerces” jurors to return a guilty verdict by identifying specific evidence in the case as important and instructing them to consider it? [read post]