Search for: "McDonald v. McDonald" Results 421 - 440 of 2,820
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am by Rose Hughes
The case of Emson v Hozelock ([2020] EWCA Civ 871) considered whether a relatively technically simple invention was non-obvious in view of an obscure prior art document. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Jon L. Gelman
A claim for public nuisance is pending against McDonald’s.III. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
IPSO IPSO has published two rulings and resolutions statements since our last Round Up: 01130-20 Freeley v wharfedaleobserver.co.uk No breach – after investigation 01129-20 Freeley v ilkleygazette.co.uk, No breach – after investigation 01128-20 Freeley v thetelegraphandargus.co.uk, No breach – after investigation 00583-20 Giblin-Jowett v express.co.uk, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 00116-20 McDonald… [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 7:05 am by Patrick Daniel Law
Product liability cases are rarely as spectacular as the McDonald’s case, or the $28 billion case of United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 10:00 am by Ezra Rosser
LynchKate Stoneman Chair in Law and Democracy, Director, Center for Excellence in Law Teaching,Director, Domestic Violence Prosecution Hybrid Clinic, Albany Law School Rhonda V. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:00 am by John Jascob
Furthermore, the complaint named seven relief defendants who received funds from the fraudulent operation for which they had no lawful entitlement (CFTC v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 9:33 am by Lowell Brown
In other action, the board: Heard a report from outside counsel on the McDonald v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 9:44 am by Schachtman
”), aff’d sub nom., Juni v. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 4:30 am by Christopher McKinney
Two weeks ago, several employees at a McDonald’s franchise in Oakland, California filed a lawsuit against their employer, in a matter entitled Hernandez v. [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 8:12 am
McCormack, Jan McDonald & Kerryn A. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 6:34 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Additionally, to the extent that the breach of contract claim is alleged and based on the same factual assertions supporting the proposed legal malpractice claim, said cause of action must be dismissed as it is a duplicative claim and/or a claim guised as a breach of contract but is in fact alleging legal malpractice (see Courtney v McDonald, 176 AD3d 645 [1st Dept 2019]). [read post]