Search for: "Mobile County Inc."
Results 421 - 440
of 464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 5:08 pm
AB 1601: Employment Protections: mass layoff, Relocation, or termination of employees: call centers Bill Text – AB-1601 Employment protections: mass layoff, relocation, or termination of employees: call centers AB 1601 prohibits a call center employer from ordering the relocation of its call center, unless 60 days before the order takes effect, the employer gives written notice to affected employees, the Employment Development Department (EDD), the local workforce investment board, and the… [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
I am proud to be partaking in this historic mobilization to show the impact of stop-and-frisk on diverse communities across our city. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 1:54 pm
Seyfarth Synopsis: Employers in California: be aware and prepare for new laws increasing minimum wages and mandating overtime pay for agricultural employees; expanding the California Fair Pay Act to race and ethnicity and to address prior salary consideration; imposing new restrictions on background checks and gig economy workers; and more. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Mike Nagata, senior vice president of CACI International Inc.; retired Lt. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 has reached an agreement with Sunoco Inc. [read post]
9 Jun 2018, 11:15 am
Group, Inc., 639 F.3d 11 (1st Cir. 2011). [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal As Trump Leans into Attacks on Mail Voting, GOP Officials Confront Signs of Republican Turnout Crisis Washington Post – Amy Gardner and Josh Dawsey | Published: 8/3/2020 Multiple public surveys show a growing divide between Democrats and Republicans about the security of voting by mail, with Republicans saying they are far less likely to trust it in November. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 9:47 am
"You've just entered Natural Horisun Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am
A LRDP is required to provide guidance for physical development, land use designations, building locations, and infrastructure systems over its time horizon; the LRDP here did so, and estimated future enrollment, but did not set enrollment levels, and its 14 listed project objectives were primarily comprised of “broad goals for land use, landscapes, open space, mobility, and infrastructure. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 6:16 am
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Washington, D.C. office and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Vol. 2, No. 15, June 5, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Vol. 2, No. 15, June 5, 2010 The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 12:19 pm
Upland Wings, Inc., of Sullivan, Mo., agreed to the penalty in an administrative consent agreement and final order placed on public notice today in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
This memo was written for an upcoming workers’ compensation trial. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm
Cox for “painful onychomycosis,” a condition that may limit mobility and impair peripheral circulation. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:02 am
(Editor's Note: This post is based on a Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP memorandum by Amy Goodman and Gillian McPhee.) [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 4:23 am
Beshada’s refusal to consider the industrial context of asbestos claims, with the usual involvement of sophisticated employers charged with providing a complex safety program for its workers, became the judicial norm in many decisions in state and federal courts. [read post]
24 May 2012, 4:06 pm
By way of background, the Complainants in this investigation are Motorola Mobility, Inc. and General Instrument Corporation (collectively, “Motorola”) and the Respondent is Microsoft Corp. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
Background Following the seminal case of Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311, this is the second significant piece of litigation arising from Google’s use of the so-called “Safari Workaround” in 2011-2012. [read post]
