Search for: "Mode v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,774
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:02 am
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
9 May 2013, 6:00 am
In Phillips v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 9:05 am
Integra Lifesciences v. [read post]
14 Nov 2007, 4:34 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Recently, in Eurocopter v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:14 am
” An early decision stated that the Panel could perform “limited modest factual research,” InfoSpace.com, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 9:54 am
Facts: This case (Clark v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:26 pm
State v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 9:00 pm
Innis, supra, at 301 (officer's subjective intent to incriminate not determinative of whether "interrogation" occurred); United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:32 am
Commonwealth v. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 8:19 am
Thomas V. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 10:02 am
The style of the case is, Quihong Liu v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 1:46 pm
Lesley Stedman Weidenbener of the Louisville Courier Journal reports today on a case to be heard Monday, June 16th, at 1:00 PM before the Indiana Supreme Court, State of Indiana v. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
(Riley v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 12:00 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 9:03 am
Rule 4:4-7 requires the proof of service to: state the name of the person served and the place, mode and date of service . . . . [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 6:11 am
And, given their dissembling, Justice and ATF are apparently in cover-up mode. [read post]
