Search for: "New York v. United States Department of Justice" Results 421 - 440 of 2,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 3:59 am
Two rulings by state courts illustrate this point, Croman v City University of New York, 277 AD2d 185, and Parisi v NYC Housing Authority, Appellate Division, First Department, 269 AD2d 210. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 12:22 pm by Mark Ashton
Two years later, under the pretense of attending a wedding, Golan flew to the United States with the child and moved into a shelter in New York. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 9:30 am by azatty
She covered the United States Supreme Court and even wrote a book on Justice Blackmun. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:04 pm by Nathaniel M. Glasser and Kate B. Rhodes
In an October 4, 2017 letter to all United States attorneys and heads of federal agencies, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) will no longer interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) to provide employment protections to transgender individuals. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 12:04 pm by Nathaniel M. Glasser and Kate B. Rhodes
In an October 4, 2017 letter to all United States attorneys and heads of federal agencies, Attorney General Jeff Sessions announced that the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) will no longer interpret Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) to provide employment protections to transgender individuals. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am by Charlotte Butash
Later that summer, the district attorney for New York County served a subpoena on Mazars on behalf of a grand jury investigating potential crimes under New York law. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm by Donald Thompson
As we know, under the due process clauses of the New York State Constitution, Article I, § 6, and the United States Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, evidence of a pretrial identification of the defendant is inadmissible if the procedure used is “unnecessarily suggestive” (Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188 [1972]; People v Adams, 53 NY2d 241 [1981]; People v Owens, 74 NY2d 677 [1989]; People v Farraro, 144… [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 6:37 pm by Lyle Denniston
This effort, he told a dinner gathering of the Human Rights Campaign, a gay rights advocacy group, is intended “to give real meaning” to the Supreme Court’s decision last June in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am by Edith Roberts
The justices held 8-1 in Pereira v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 6:52 am by admin
It is debate that this decision abrogates last year’s decision of the New York State Appellate Division in Gold v. [read post]