Search for: "PARTY CITY HOLDINGS, INC."
Results 421 - 440
of 2,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jun 2015, 12:50 pm
In the recent case of Cronimet Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 10:15 am
In a casebook-worthy unanimous opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg in Sprint Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 6:16 pm
Sunbeam Prod., Inc., No. 2012-1581 (Fed. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 4:44 am
Capital City Bank Grp., Inc., 94 USPQ2d 1645, 1660 (TTAB 2010), aff’d, 637 F.3d 1344, 98 USPQ2d 1253 (Fed. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 8:42 pm
City Nat’l Bank, 592 F.2d 504, 507 (1978). [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:21 am
Capital City Bank Group Inc., 98 USPQ2d 1253, 1259 (Fed. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
City of St. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 5:26 pm
City of Phoenix, 798 F.2d 1260 (9th Cir.1986), also supports a holding that the passive solicitation rule is content-neutral. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 10:43 pm
American Security Systems, Inc., presumably was responsible for installing and/or maintaining the intercom system and, by contract, agreed to hold harmless and indemnify NYCHA. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:30 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:06 pm
City of Glendale, 15 Cal.3d 328, 336-39 (1975) (holding that a memorandum of understanding reached under a broader statute is “indubitably binding”); Olson v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
AT&T Corp., 14 So. 3d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that a venue provision was mandatory where it provided: “The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in New York City, USA. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 5:41 am
AT&T Corp., 14 So. 3d 1224, 1226 (Fla. 5th DCA 2009) (holding that a venue provision was mandatory where it provided: “The parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts located in New York City, USA. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 3:32 pm
The caption: SINGER MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS, INC.; LIVE GOLD OPERATIONS, INC., v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 9:55 pm
” In so holding, the Supreme Court essentially reversed the Court of Appeal’s decision in Party City Corp. v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 2:00 pm
As to the City’s arguments that the Plaintiffs’ disparate impact claims were insufficiently pleaded and were foreclosed by the Supreme Court’s holding in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
22 Aug 2017, 8:14 pm
LON SMITH & ASSOCIATES, INC. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 5:49 am
City of Chicago, No. 09-2020, slip op. at —- (7th Cir. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 9:15 am
LVJ, Inc. [read post]