Search for: "Parks v. Jones" Results 421 - 440 of 643
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  He then went on to say that use of a right to pass and re-pass (as opposed to a car-parking easement) does not amount to actual occupation ([31]). [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:48 am by Dave
  He then went on to say that use of a right to pass and re-pass (as opposed to a car-parking easement) does not amount to actual occupation ([31]). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 1:29 am by INFORRM
This question was addressed in the case of Davison v Habeeb ([2011] EWHC 3031 (QB)) handed down on 25 November 2011 by HHJ Parkes QC (sitting as a judge of the High Court). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 9:04 pm by Lyle Denniston
  As the Supreme Court put it in a 1984 decision (Bob Jones University v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Stewart Baker
It’s not hard to find support for that view if you compare United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 2:51 am by SHG
  Via Ashby Jones at the WSJ. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Jones — came in the case of U.S. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 8:23 pm
The warrant authorized the agents to install the GPS system within 10 days and only within the D.C. area, but the agents waited 11 days and did not install it until Jones's car was parked in a public parking lot in Maryland. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am by Orin Kerr
In the Jones case, federal agents approached the defendant’s car when it was in a public parking lot and affixed a GPS device to the undercarriage of the car. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 12:32 am by Orin Kerr
Imagine you parked your car in a parking lot, and you later came back and found someone underneath your car just hanging out. [read post]