Search for: "Paul A. Julian" Results 421 - 440 of 551
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2012, 5:58 pm by B. Keller
Just over one minute in, Julian Glover’s sonorous tones seize our attention. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am by INFORRM
.” Since last week’s round up there are a number of “resolved” PCC complaints to report: Mr Julian Assange v The Observer The Observer, clause 1, 09/03/2012; Mrs Christine Hemming v Sunday Mercury, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mrs Carol Mlatem v South Wales Argus, clause 3, 08/03/2012; Ms Pamela Fenton v Sunday Mail, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mr Peter Mendham v East Anglian Daily Times, clause 1, 08/03/2012; Mr Peter Mendham v Eastern Daily Press & East Anglian Daily… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:29 am by Julian Ku
by Julian Ku Here is the second round of my exchange with Professor David Weissbrodt over at Pointoflaw. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Paul Gibbons (@foimanUK) explained the campaign here. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:33 pm by David Friedman
It included a respectful reference to the late Julian Simon. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 10:58 pm by INFORRM
He expanded on this theme a few days later, in the Mail, 31 May 2011, in a piece under the headline ‘Why Twitter Knows More About Morality Than High Court Judges’, which was quoted at length by Paul Dacre when he appeared before the Leveson Inquiry on 6 February 2012. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:26 am by INFORRM
 Former tabloid journalist Paul McMullan unwittingly provided one of the most memorable moments of the inquiry by uttering the infamous line “privacy is for paedos”. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:54 am by Anita Davies
During the appeal, counsel for Paul Chambers argued that only “a halfwit” would treat the tweet as a real threat. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:39 am by Rob Robinson
bit.ly/yidh22 (Craig Ball) Reports and Resources 2011 Year-End Data Privacy and Security Update – bit.ly/xeMiYu (Gibson Dunn) 76% of Business Execs Would Pay Premium for Certified Information Professionals – bit.ly/yJcLap (John Mancini) AIIM Study Shows Eliminating Paper From Processes Improves Customer Response Times by 300 Percent – bit.ly/z437qz (Marketwire) eDiscovery Best Practices: A Staged Look At Process And Law (Google+) bit.ly/Ash9Zd (@OrangeLT) Pretrial Practice &… [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
At the WSJ Law Blog, Jess Bravin discusses Justice John Paul Stevens’s repeated criticisms of Justice William O. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:42 am by admin
Paul man was convicted of second-degree manslaughter after he allegedly failed to help his girlfriend’s dying 2-year-old son. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
On the morning of Tuesday 20 December 2011 the Court heard further evidence from Julian Pike. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 10:21 am by Kim Zetter
Paul Almanza, will now draw a report of recommendations of what charges, if any, Manning should face in a court martial. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 5:48 am by Glenn Reynolds
PAUL BUTLER: Jury Nullification Is A Good Thing. “Earlier this year, prosecutors charged Julian P. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Julian Petley (@julianpetley) – Professor of Screen Media and Journalism at Brunel University; recently gave evidence to Leveson Inquiry. 51. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 6:06 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Last week, I had a post discussing an article which favored the prosecution of Professor Julian P. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 11:15 pm by admin
 As Professor Butler explains, earlier this year, Julian P. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:48 pm by Lovechilde
Defense Challenges Impartiality of Investigating Officer On Friday, December 16, Manning’s civilian lawyer, David Coombs challenged the impartiality of the investigating officer US Army Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Paul Almanza, citing Almanza’s civilian employment as a lawyer in the Department of Justice which has conducted investigations on Manning, Julian Assange, and Wikileaks. [read post]