Search for: "Pearl v. Pearl"
Results 421 - 440
of 512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jul 2012, 6:52 am
Partington v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
(Spicy IP) IP matters lead the way for India’s first e-court (Spicy IP) Copyright, arbitration and a feted film: Tandav Films v Four Frames (Spicy IP) Israel Israel patent office goes green! [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm
Tool Without a Handle: Are You Not Trained? [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am
Co. v E. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 8:47 pm
Burns, Suresh v. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 10:48 am
Cavel v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 12:42 pm
Acevedo v. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 10:22 am
Loewy’s article Why Roe v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
” (quoting Cioffi v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:30 am
Larry is also a Pearl Jam fan which has nothing to do with the law. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 3:30 am
” (quoting Cioffi v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:07 am
Foi o Pearl Harbor de nossa geração. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 3:07 am
Foi o Pearl Harbor de nossa geração. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:00 am
Miller and Smith v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 5:08 am
National Security Agency (NSA) General Counsel Glenn Gerstell presented an interesting and surprising challenge last week, writing in the New York Times that the United States must be ready to face the “profound and enduring implications of the digital revolution. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 4:05 am
That change is visible within the apex organs of the contemporary state system ((Text of A/ES-11/L.1; UN General Assembly Resolution -- "Aggression against Ukraine"; UKRAINE v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 9:46 am
State v. [read post]
9 Aug 2024, 9:16 am
Similarly, when the US Supreme Court took up the issue of whether Colorado could keep Trump off the primary ballot under the Insurrection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, nominal liberals were all over the place offering pearl-clutching arguments about the sanctity of the vote, with one saying that Bush v. [read post]
