Search for: "People v. DISTRICT COURT OF FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT"
Results 421 - 440
of 622
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 10:19 am
” In its jurisdictional statement, the appellants ask “whether the ‘one-person, one-vote’ principle of the Fourteenth Amendment creates a judicially enforceable right ensuring that the districting process does not deny voters an equal vote. [read post]
11 May 2015, 9:35 am
Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
The Federal Judicial Center organized and produced the Manual, in response to the kernel panic created by the Supreme Court’s mandate that federal trial judges serve as gatekeepers of the methodological propriety of testifying expert witnesses’ opinions. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 8:05 am
Maryland violations by the district attorney in Orleans Parish. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 1:37 pm
Because the verdict in Parrish was not supported by the evidence, the Fifth District Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s denial and remanded for a new trial on damages. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am
Johnson; (2) whether a conviction aided by the prosecution's failure to produce evidence that contradicted its theory and showed that the evidence it did rely upon and the resulting jury arguments were false violates the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments under this Court's Brady v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s 1985 ruling in Heckler v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 9:30 am
Because class actions are out of control in California, there are lots more ascertainability cases in Ninth Circuit district courts that we haven't cited. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 4:38 pm
The Court rendered a rather fuzzy 5-4 decision in Panetti's favor saying the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals had applied the test too narrowly and requiring a new hearing in the District Court.The District Judge followed the Supreme Court's direction, held an extensive hearing with multiple experts on both sides, and wrote a 62-page decision. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:45 am
The Fifth District Court of Appeals upheld the 422nd Court’s denial of the bill of review for numerous reasons. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 11:49 pm
V. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
The district court and Eleventh Circuit agreed with Grunkle Sam. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 4:54 pm
When the matter was adjourned to this court, the People withdrew their prior consent and objected to holding the hearing, arguing that defendant did not have a right to an evidentiary hearing solely at his request. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 6:20 pm
”[1] In the United States statutes do not exist alone—the sole expression of the power of the people to govern themselves. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
