Search for: "People v. Good"
Results 421 - 440
of 22,429
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Professor Adrian Vermeule agrees with the 1920 progressive consensus that courts should not interfere when legislatures adopt policies that reasonable people think pursue the public good. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 2:04 pm
(And, in a bizarre reality, they cared -- weirdly, for good reason -- much more about the size of their restitution orders than whether they were sentenced to death or not.)What a weird world in which we live. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 7:40 am
People v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:50 am
It's all good if it goes down, but I want heads. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm
MySpace and Doe v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am
Circuit is considering direct challenges to the Good Neighbor Rule (Utah v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 6:04 am
While the Supreme Court was deciding issues of standing, a good number of people wondered: "who needs standing when you have reexamination? [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
I‘ve never seen so many people so eager to get out of here. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:10 am
Some estimates have put the sale of counterfeit items at a billion dollars in 2013, and anyone who has traveled around mainland Europe has probably seen people sell "authentic" designer bags off pieces of carpet on the street (and who doesn't like purchasing their luxury goods in the great outdoors). [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 12:06 pm
"Good for her. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:35 pm
PubPat v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 7:56 am
Several justices in previous cases, such as Mitchell v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 11:59 pm
See Peoples Federal Sav. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:31 pm
Just remember that People v. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 12:18 pm
Good for everyone. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
Good to know that 2011 isn't any different than 2010. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 6:35 pm
Because it's a very interesting case that provides firm support for the proposition (1) that attorneys can (and perhaps even must) present testimony from their client that they're pretty sure is false (as here, IMHO) so long as they don't "know" it's perjurious, and (2) that putting the client up on the stand without direct examination, and letting him give his perjurious testimony narratively, is a pretty good solution to the problem.Both propositions are… [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 3:47 pm
Mind you, I'm not positive that that's an especially good practice. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
People don't do anything without reasons. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
From the case Commil v. [read post]
