Search for: "Phillips v. Phillips"
Results 421 - 440
of 4,217
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2021, 3:00 am
Contracts: SDNY Says the Pandemic is a “Force Majeure” This Shearman blog reviews the SDNY’s recent decision in JN Contemporary Art v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 8:26 am
Phillips Seyfarth Synopsis: Arbitration agreements with class and collective action waivers can help employers limit litigation exposure, especially to wage and hour claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 11:58 am
The plaintiffs argued that the court was required, from their decision in Gerber v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 3:19 pm
Nevada Dept. of Human Resources v. [read post]
8 Feb 2021, 6:00 am
(quoting Phillips v. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 1:09 pm
The ruling, Bostock v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 11:16 am
Phillips, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 3:25 pm
Supreme Court’s 1978 decision in Monell v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 4:22 am
” Phillips v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 12:31 pm
Background The case now before the Supreme Court, BP PLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 4:20 pm
Curtis v Phillips (Civil Dispute) [2020] ACAT 115- a case concerning a Facebook post which made alleged defamatory comments against the claimant and how they conducted their cake making business. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
A little history: in 1989, in the seminal Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Readers interested in learning about another Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act case currently before the Supreme Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am
Additionally, in Phillip v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 9:41 am
These issues were recently litigated in Brownell v. [read post]
8 Jan 2021, 3:30 am
As the IAS court found, the allegations underlying plaintiff’s malpractice claim were couched in terms of “gross speculations” about future events, without the requisite factual basis to support the allegation (see Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:23 pm
California Courts have taken this lenient approach because ‘the law and facts to promote the beneficial purposes of the homestead legislation to benefit the debtor’” [Phillips v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
29 Dec 2020, 4:05 pm
” In Schapira v Ahronson [1999] EMLR 735 Phillips L.J. described it as an “uphill task” for an Israeli newspaper to try to persuade the court that Israel was clearly the more appropriate forum to determine an action for defamation brought in England by an English domiciled claimant whose claim was confined to publication within England and Wales. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 11:58 am
See Our Lady of Guadalupe Sch. v. [read post]
