Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 4,545
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am by Shari Shapiro
In essence, Murray is claiming that EPA and the states cannot double regulate power plants. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm by Bartolus
Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:50 pm
The stated intent of the Price-Anderson Act was to foster commercial development of nuclear power. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 1:09 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals – ARCO Shifts from State to Federal and No Vigor for VIMOn June 18, 2020, the court decided the case of Baker, et al. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:27 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Regus (UK) Ltd v Epcot Solutions Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 361 (15 April 2008) London Borough of Wandsworth v Allison [2008] EWCA Civ 354 (15 April 2008) YB (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 360 (15 April 2008) High Court (Family Division) Nottingham City Council v G & Ors [2008] EWHC 540 (Fam) (18 March 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) Office of Government Commerce v… [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Charles Sartain
Pel-State Bulk Plant, LLC ________________________________________________________________________ Just received notice of a Texas subcontractor’s mineral lien? [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 11:39 am by Christine Corcos
This article considers the interplay between author and nature in United States copyright law, using Kelley v Chicago Park District as a catalyst. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 11:39 am
This article considers the interplay between author and nature in United States copyright law, using Kelley v Chicago Park District as a catalyst. [read post]
8 May 2009, 12:10 am
We're pleased by the dismissal of Myers-Armstrong v. [read post]