Search for: "Points v. Points" Results 421 - 440 of 90,867
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
I -- I notice that in -- in the government's position you don't argue the Commerce Clause very much, and I -- we have got at Morrison v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:10 am
David Skeel has written a law review article on the seminal Delaware Supreme Court decision of Aronson v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 9:02 pm
 There is good reason to pay attention: the classifications that DSM-V puts forward will end up affecting us all, and as the article points out: "This is not cardiology or nephrology, where the basic diseases are well known," said Edward Shorter, a leading historian of psychiatry whose latest book, "Before Prozac," is critical of the manual. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
Regina v Xu and Others Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Persons convicted of being concerned in the large scale commercial cultivation or production of cannabis, could expect to receive sentences with a starting point of three years if they acted as a gardener, six to seven years if they acted as an organiser, three to seven years if they acted as a manager and higher sentences where they controlled a large number of such operations. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 7:37 am by On behalf of Whit Drake
Owners of the following vehicles should have them checked and fixed in order to ensure a safe passenger airbag: 2001-2003 Toyota Corolla, Sequoia and Tundra 2001-2003 Lexus SC 430 2002-2003 Honda CR-V 2001-2003 Honda Civic 2002 Honda Odyssey 2003-2004 Mazda 6 2004 Mazda RX-8 2001-2003 Nissan Maxima, Infiniti FX, Infiniti QX4, Pathfinder and SentraWhen a car is going at highway speeds and an accident occurs, a motorist can suffer catastrophic injuries if the safety features of the vehicle… [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 10:25 am
Isn't one point -- indeed, a central point -- of having a judiciary to convince people not to engage in self-help remedies? [read post]
14 May 2012, 6:15 am by Jay S. Becker
The New Jersey Appellate Division recently affirmed the dismissal of a claim of retaliation under the Conscientious Employee Protection Act1 (CEPA), finding that the plaintiff did not engage in any protected activity when she reported violations of law to her supervisor and managers as part of her job responsibilities. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:00 am by John McFarland
In this case, decided last April, the Texas Supreme Court held that the force majeure clause in an oil and gas lease could not be relied on to extend the date by which a well had to be commenced to keep the lease in force. [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 4:50 am by Charles Oldfield
The Supreme Court of Ohio, Commission on Professionalism, has published Professionalism Dos & Don’ts: Legal Writing.[1] Each Do and Don’t has several subpoints. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 9:41 am
The main point of Schütz (UK) Ltd v Werit (UK) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 303 (29 March 2011) was whether a patent for an intermediate bulk carrier - essentially a large plastic bottle tightly encased in a tight metal cage constructed from tubes flattened at each join - could be infringed by inserting the bottle into a cage constructed from differently connected members.The relevant claim was as [read post]