Search for: "Powell v. Doe"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,040
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2016, 8:19 am
On April 19, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Jessica Jacobson v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
Wade, or Obergefell v. [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Supreme Court handed down its decision on the case McCleskey v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:22 am
Powell, April 19, 2016, Gorsuch, N.). [read post]
16 Apr 2016, 5:39 pm
The Center for Powell Crossing, LLC v City of Powell, 2016 WL 1165355 (SD OH 3/25/2016)Filed under: Comprehensive Plan, Current Caselaw, Due Process, Takings [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 5:21 am
Additional judicial scrutiny required in reviewing a compulsory arbitration proceedingHamilton v Alley, 2016 NY Slip Op 01928, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentWilliam E. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:05 pm
High court should step in against law regulating speech regarding ballot measures by small, low-budget groups [John Kramer, Institute for Justice on Justice v. [read post]
27 Mar 2016, 9:30 pm
Here's the abstract: City of Cleburne v. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 12:17 pm
In Habeas Corpus Resource Center v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Beydoun, Electing Islamophobia, (March 6, 2016).Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, Fragmented Oversight of Nonprofits in the United States: Does it Work? [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:57 am
Powell, 298 N.C. 453, 464-65 (1979)). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 7:57 am
Powell, 298 N.C. 453, 464-65 (1979)). [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
Doe, February 16, 2016, Chang, E.).Alleged spoofing. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 5:00 am
In People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:49 am
See Washington v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 6:29 am
The high-water mark for socioeconomic disadvantage as an aspect of “diversity” in case law came in Bakke v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke, Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:28 pm
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke (17 EPD ¶8402 (1978)), Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
6 Dec 2015, 11:06 am
But as McMahon observes, if the high court ruled to enforce Brown v. [read post]
