Search for: "Rising v. Brown" Results 421 - 440 of 1,075
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2017, 3:30 am by Anders Walker
Such modernizations exploded dramatically following the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Dara Brown and Jaeeun Shin at Cornell’s Legal Information Institute also provide a preview. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 9:31 pm by RegBlog
  Still Seeking Contraceptive Compromise After Zubik v. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 10:29 am
 Seems the California Supreme Court thinks so, too, and so under Briggs and Van de Kamp v. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 12:14 pm
Corcos, The Scrying Game: The First Amendment, State Regulation of the Crafty Sciences, and the Rise of Spiritualism, 1848-1944, forthcoming in v. 38 of Whittier L. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Sept. 9, Dowling, J.).Whether other trial court judges from around the commonwealth will rule in a similar fashion or will, instead, apply the same rule of discovery pertaining to video surveillance remains to be seen.Claims of Privileged Information in DiscoveryIn its decision in the case Brown v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 3:30 am by INFORRM
” The Court referred to a 19th century House of Lords decision: Browne v Dunn (1894) 6 R 67, expressing a principle which should be obvious to anyone in adversarial legal practice: “… I have always understood that if you intend to impeach a witness you are bound, whilst he is in the box, to give him an opportunity of making any explanation which is open to him; and, as it seems to me, that is not only a rule of professional practice in the conduct of a case,… [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 2:02 pm by Jay
City of Oakland (1996) 47 Cal.App.4th 364, 373; Brown v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:26 am by Dennis Crouch
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U.S. 120, 159-60 (2000)). [read post]