Search for: "Rules of Evidence v. Rules"
Results 421 - 440
of 59,362
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Performs an Emergency Service or Function The entity provides one or more of the following emergency services or functions to a population equal to or greater than 50,000 individuals: (i) Law enforcement; (ii) Fire and rescue services; (iii) Emergency medical services; (iv) Emergency management; or (v) Public works that contribute to public health and safety. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
Such issues were precisely raised in a 2006 ruling (albeit one that was later vacated as moot, which eliminates any precedential value) from the U.S. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 7:41 pm
Palkon et. al. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:26 pm
The evidence suggests that you certainly didn't intend to kill them, but nonetheless that you wanted to punch them somewhere on their body where it would hurt a lot, and didn't particularly think (or care) about whether they might perhaps die as a result of your blows. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held that treatment records and communications with mental-healthcare providers are protected from discovery under Federal Rule of Evidence 501. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 8:11 am
Muldrow v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:41 am
And in Prosecutor v. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 4:11 am
State of Minnesota v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:31 pm
However, admissibility of scientific evidence is generally governed by FRE 702, along with precedent in Frye v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 4:42 pm
However, as demonstrated in a recent Texas ruling issued in a truck accident case, JNM Express, et al. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
There was epidemiologic evidence on silicone and connective tissue disease before the Oregon federal district court and its technical advisors, and the court resoundingly rejected the plaintiffs’ causal claims as unsupported by valid evidence, with or without epidemiologic evidence. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 6:56 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 1:45 am
The parties could not afford an expert to provide evidence to the court, which ruled in the mother’s favour as the child’s primary carer. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:03 pm
Following the en banc decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
The holdings of the principal cases Trump cites for the "clear statement" rule, especially Franklin v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 12:16 pm
There has to be evidence of the reliance on the promise. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 10:02 am
Stale evidence, especially testimony recollected years later, is easily manipulated, and when there is no evidence to manipulate, other evidence can be manufactured. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 7:02 am
Gouty v. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
This is why, when reviewing a district court's ruling on a motion for judgment as a matter of law, we "disregard all evidence favorable to the moving party that the jury was not required to believe. [read post]
