Search for: "STATE OF ILLINOIS v. STATE OF INDIANA"
Results 421 - 440
of 805
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2014, 4:25 am
In the case Brain Life v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 3:38 pm
He appears to have led an exemplary life in the U.S. since entering (lawfully) and applying for asylum.United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
Some states qualify their safe harbors with modifying adverbs, such as "specifically," "expressly," or "affirmatively" (Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, New Mexico, Ohio, Tennessee, Utah). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 11:57 am
See Butler v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
Illinois. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - Illinois and Missouri trademark attorneys for James Dean, Inc. of Indiana sued in Indiana state court alleging that Twitter, Inc. of California infringed the trademark James Dean, which has been issued by the U.S. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 9:33 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - An Indiana trademark attorney for Noble Roman's, Inc. of Indianapolis, Indiana sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that B & MP, LLC (which was dissolved in 2011) and Leslie Perdriau of Apple River, Illinois (collectively, "B & MP") infringed the trademark Noble Roman's, Registration No. 987,069, as well as the trademark, The Better Pizza People, Registration No. 1,920,428. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
Q4: How long is the statutory post-mortem publicity right in Indiana? [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 6:19 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In a 42-page complaint for damages and injunctive relief, trademark attorneys for Sprint Solutions, Inc. of Reston, Virginia; Sprint Communications Company L.P. and Boost Worldwide, Inc., the latter two of Overland Park, Kansas (collectively, "Sprint") sued in the Southern District of Indiana alleging that Reginald Aldridge and Arrice Aldridge, both of Park Forest, Illinois, and Damion Transou of Humboldt, Tennessee infringed certain Sprint… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 9:56 am
In PhoneDog v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 11:02 am
She has received licenses to practice law in Illinois and California and is admitted to all courts in the State of California. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 7:26 am
Related blog posts: Insurance Company’s Restrictive Endorsement Did Not Limit Coverage in Accident; Indiana Insurance Co. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 1:12 am
“This is what they are trying to do: weaken the union,” said Flora Johnson, executive chairwoman of SEIU Healthcare Illinois and Indiana. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
On April 25, 2013, the Illinois Supreme Court decided Palm v. 2800 Lake Shore Drive Condominium Ass’n, 2013 IL 110505. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:06 pm
In the case of Harris v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 8:08 am
Indianapolis, Indiana - In the matter of Orbitz, LLC v. [read post]
It’s Getting Icy Out, So Don’t Fall and Hurt Your (Non-Diverse Defendant in a) Hip (Replacement MDL)
20 Dec 2013, 8:59 am
In Millman, plaintiffs (patient and spouse) sued the Indiana-based manufacturer of the product at issue in Cook County, Illinois, state court, which just happens to be a fairly plaintiff-friendly jurisdiction. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 10:02 am
And indeed the logic of United States v. [read post]
